Re: Using SSLClientIOEventDispatch

2009-07-23 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 06:41:26PM -0400, Peter Soles wrote: I checked the archives of the list - coudn't find the answer to my question. Apologies if I missed something. I'm writing a simulator that will simulate many clients long polling the same server. The server requires SSL so I'm

Re: Using SSLClientIOEventDispatch

2009-07-23 Thread Peter Soles
Thanks for the response. I am using 4.0.1 of HttpCore. I looked a little more into it and found that the number of requests and responses is dependent on the server I am contacting. For example, I tried pointing the code to the gmail login page and got many more than 100 request/response pairs.

Re: Using SSLClientIOEventDispatch

2009-07-23 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
Peter Soles wrote: Thanks for the response. I am using 4.0.1 of HttpCore. I looked a little more into it and found that the number of requests and responses is dependent on the server I am contacting. For example, I tried pointing the code to the gmail login page and got many more than 100

Re: Using SSLClientIOEventDispatch

2009-07-23 Thread Peter Soles
Thanks Oleg - I guess I goofed in my understanding of how the handler works. Need to read the tutorial (again!). I would definitely like to use a connection manager to reuse the connection. It's working great now! Thanks again for the help. Peter On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Oleg

Re: [HttpClient] HttpClient 4.0-rc2

2009-07-23 Thread sebb
Pressed send too soon: SSLSocketFactory is not inherently thread-safe, because of the [gs]etHostNameVerifier() methods. Is there a need to change the HostNameVerifier after construction, or could the verifier be provided to the ctor? Alternatively, perhaps the field could be made volatile? On