Re: Support for http 2.0

2015-02-24 Thread Tony Anecito
My guess is IT and developers will be pushed to quickly use the new standard and bypass HC to use a simpler solution in the interim. Regards,-Tony On Tuesday, February 24, 2015 12:39 PM, Tony Anecito adanec...@yahoo.com.INVALID wrote: Thanks Gary looks like discussions are

Re: Support for http 2.0

2015-02-24 Thread Tony Anecito
Thanks Gary looks like discussions are happening but nothing is ever vary fast. -Tony On Tuesday, February 24, 2015 12:08 PM, Gary Gregory garydgreg...@gmail.com wrote: Please see https://marc.info/?l=httpclient-commons-devm=142434644830689w=2 Gary On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:56

Re: HttpClient OSGI manifest import-package missing

2015-02-24 Thread Oleg Kalnichevski
On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 17:39 +0530, srihari na wrote: Hi Team, When using OSGI bundles of http client v4.4 and we use PoolingHttpClientConnectionManager which is internally using SSLContexts from org.apache.http.ssl package of http core bundle. Though this package is availabe in

HttpClient OSGI manifest import-package missing

2015-02-24 Thread srihari na
Hi Team, When using OSGI bundles of http client v4.4 and we use PoolingHttpClientConnectionManager which is internally using SSLContexts from org.apache.http.ssl package of http core bundle. Though this package is availabe in export-package of core manifest, it is not imported by client bundle

Support for http 2.0

2015-02-24 Thread Tony Anecito
Hi All, Is there plans by Apache http components to support http 2.0? Thanks,-Tony

Re: Support for http 2.0

2015-02-24 Thread Gary Gregory
Please see https://marc.info/?l=httpclient-commons-devm=142434644830689w=2 Gary On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Tony Anecito adanec...@yahoo.com.invalid wrote: Hi All, Is there plans by Apache http components to support http 2.0? Thanks,-Tony -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com |

Re: Support for http 2.0

2015-02-24 Thread Tony Anecito
Actually there are other pluses. For one the number of sockets will go down dramatically to one since the data is multiplexed over one socket which the app server people will really want. Also, there is header compression which for mobile devices is very important since most of thier

Re: Support for http 2.0

2015-02-24 Thread Gary Gregory
The question for this project IMO is how to best implement HTTP/2 if at all within the bounds of the current code base. This has nothing to do with the merits of HTTP/2, there is no need to talk about that. It may be that the changes are so vast that we'd be better off with a new project and code

Re: Support for http 2.0

2015-02-24 Thread Brett Ryan
Tony, HTTP/2 is 1.1 backwards compatible. If the client doesn't understand HTTP/2 then it will not elect HTTP/2 features. From my understanding performance gains are only going to be noticed by the new push mechanism that allows the server serve up parts of the content that the server thinks

Re: Support for http 2.0

2015-02-24 Thread Stefan Magnus Landrø
What do you mean by simpler? Sendt fra min iPhone Den 24. feb. 2015 kl. 20.46 skrev Tony Anecito adanec...@yahoo.com.INVALID: My guess is IT and developers will be pushed to quickly use the new standard and bypass HC to use a simpler solution in the interim. Regards,-Tony On

Re: Support for http 2.0

2015-02-24 Thread Tony Anecito
Good question. Simpler means no frameworks without all the features and focus on simple url type calls to take advantage of the performance to begin with.http 2.0 is mostly about performance. The question is what will be available this month and beginning next month and who will be early