Public bug reported:
--no-optimize:
http://i.imgur.com/Bc9hD.jpg
How it should look:
http://i.imgur.com/MAyhz.jpg
Win7 x64 w/ 32bit and x64 Hugin 2011.1 RC1 (2011.0.0.8f1447ab8649 built
by Matthew Petroff), multithreaded Enblend. Project contains less than
ten fisheye images encompassing the who
Actually, using --fine-mask with --no-optimize works correctly.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Hugin Bug
Hunters, which is subscribed to Enblend.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/785803
Title:
Enblend --no-optimize produces black holes into panoramas
Status i
Example .pto attached.
** Attachment added: "DSC_5533-DSC_5563.pto"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/enblend/+bug/785803/+attachment/2137228/+files/DSC_5533-DSC_5563.pto
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Hugin Bug
Hunters, which is subscribed to Enblend.
https://bug
Public bug reported:
I have lens profiled and have saved the profile as a .ini file. When I
load images Hugin asks for the FoV etc for the images as usual and if I
use the load lens button and point Hugin to the lens profile, the lens
projection shown isn't correct (should be stereographic, is rec
Public bug reported:
Since control points are used to align images it's kind of counter-
intuitive to have stacks linked when/if there's control points defined
between the images of the stack. More than once I've had to restitch
everything because the stacks were still linked.
Also there's specia
Yep, it's completely unusable. Back to 2012.0.0.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Hugin Bug
Hunters, which is subscribed to Hugin.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1274187
Title:
Too many Warning popups
Status in Hugin - Panorama Tools GUI:
New
Bug descripti
Public bug reported:
Not a bug report per se but a small feature request. The possibility to
copy and paste image position from image to another would be nice
feature to have in Hugin. Now transferring image position from image to
image is a steb-by-step process involving lots of repetition repeti
Public bug reported:
It is possible to use hotkeys 0, 1 and 2 to zoom in on the image in
control points tab. Similar hotkeys would be very useful in mask tab
too. Maybe additional hotkeys for 50% and 25% zooms too?
** Affects: hugin
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You receive
Public bug reported:
Would be nice if it did.
I tried stacking with Raw Therapee's 32bit floating point files,
remapping went smoothly but hugin_stack ended up throwing this error
"unsupported pixel type: FLOAT".
** Affects: hugin
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received
Public bug reported:
pretty self-explanatory: set the output panorama resolution to
22x11 pixels and hugin tells in the stitcher tab the final
image resolution will be -1078 megapixels
screenshot: https://i.imgur.com/BavII1b.png
** Affects: hugin
Importance: Undecided
Stat
** Attachment added: "preview image.png"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hugin/+bug/1907983/+attachment/5443214/+files/preview%20image.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Hugin Bug
Hunters, which is subscribed to Hugin.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907983
Tit
Public bug reported:
clicking an item on list, then shift+clicking somewhere else on the list
usually selects the items between the two clicks. this already works in
the main image list in Photos tab, but it also should work in Optimizer
and Exposure tabs' image lists' check boxes for optimizing i
does it select the checkboxes or just the list items? on windows only
the list items are selected, but not the checkboxes
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Hugin Bug
Hunters, which is subscribed to Hugin.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907983
Title:
shift-clic
Public bug reported:
1: load a set of images that are larger than the images specified in the
template .pto file
2: image parameters d, e and Vx, Vy are incorrectly scaled for the new images
In this case, the original files were 4924 × 7378 pixels and the new
files were 9824 × 14720 pixels in si
Yes, the expected value would be approx double since the image
dimensions are approx. doubled, but now Hugin scales them by one
million(!) and that is way out of line.
Relevant line in the .pto:
d-8.64110014684784 e29.8343029352771
The values in Hugin when the .pto is applied as a template:
d: -8
15 matches
Mail list logo
