HI
On May 16, 10:28 pm, PortlandPano wrote:
> Are there any freeware control point generators that can handle 32
> bit?
>
Doubtful.
> I am trying to create panoramic HDRs with a combination of Photoshop
> cs3 and freeware tools. What would be a recommended work flow for me?
> cs3 cannot stitch
Hi panoplayer
Sometimes (often, in fact, with fisheye images) you just have to use
manual control points. Automatic CPs tend to bunch up in places that
aren't very useful for definng the basic image alignment. In case
like this I usually start by deleting most of the points in the
heaviest bunc
Are there any freeware control point generators that can handle 32
bit?
I am trying to create panoramic HDRs with a combination of Photoshop
cs3 and freeware tools. What would be a recommended work flow for me?
cs3 cannot stitch 32 bit and when I create panos of each exposure
using photomerge the
Hi
I guess there will always be 2 schools of thought about pano layouts.
Being an engineer, I believe you shouldn't shoot a pano until you have
planned the layout, and probably written it down. Bruno belongs to
the "just shoot away and let Hugin sort it out" school, which is
presumably larger.
Hi
The current autopano-sift-c definitely does not support color depths
greater than 16 bits. But it could fairly easily be made to do so.
The images used for interest point finding are monochrome with 32-bit
float pixels, those could be generated from any sort of input image.
I'm not sure, but
Hi,
I wrote the nearest feature transform. It does not work correctly.
I have two separate fixes in mind but little time to implement them.
Andrew
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 5:52 AM, prunkdump wrote:
>
> argh!! I'am discovered!
>
> Hi,
>
> I'am the author of glpano. I'am very new in programmin
I tried panomatic and it appears to read the images but it never finds
any control points.
Interesting thought about switching out the tonemapped and HDR tiffs.
I am trying to think of ways to batch the process so I am not sure how
to proceed on that one but I will look into it. Thanks for the re
On Sat 16-May-2009 at 08:26 -0700, PortlandPano wrote:
>
> So my question is does autopano-sift-c work on 32 bit tif images? It
> also failed on hdr images.
I'm fairly sure that autopano-sift-c doesn't work with HDR data
(patches welcome). Maybe panomatic supports HDR.
If you have to use autom
Thanks, both patches applied (svn 3858 & 3859).
--
Bruno
On Sat 16-May-2009 at 10:16 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>
>in the process of trying to prepare 0.8.0 for Debian GNU/Linux I have
>started going over the copyright/license headers. In src/celeste many
>files are missing copyright informa
and Incony is Incony at Trueblood on SecondLife.
On May 16, 4:44 pm, Dale Beams wrote:
> send me a link to secondlife? i'd like to see it. this is attainable imho
>
>
>
>
>
> > Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 08:38:57 -0700
> > Subject: [hugin-ptx] Re: Stereographic video
> > From: inc...@incony.org
>
http://secondlife.com/whatis/
On May 16, 4:44 pm, Dale Beams wrote:
> send me a link to secondlife? i'd like to see it. this is attainable imho
>
>
>
>
>
> > Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 08:38:57 -0700
> > Subject: [hugin-ptx] Re: Stereographic video
> > From: inc...@incony.org
> > To: hugin-ptx@goo
I am new to Hugin and having some issues generating control points
when the images are hdr. When I try to generate from within Hugin I
get a wnexecute error. So I tried the below from the command line and
it also fails.
autopano-sift-c --projection 0,66 project.pto 1.tif 2.tif 3.tif 4.tif
5.tif 6
send me a link to secondlife? i'd like to see it. this is attainable imho
> Date: Sat, 16 May 2009 08:38:57 -0700
> Subject: [hugin-ptx] Re: Stereographic video
> From: inc...@incony.org
> To: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
>
>
> If one could use a 3D program like Secondlife to map the imag
If one could use a 3D program like Secondlife to map the images onto
3D objects, then one could walk or fly inside that 3D map, sadly the
3D object mapping of Secondlife while good, isnt good enough yet,but
its getting there. For status places, like cathedrals and important
places it is possible t
On 2009-05-16 Andreas Metzler wrote:
[...]
> Thanks. I will post a patch.
Attached.
thanks, cu andreas
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"hugin and other free panoramic software" group.
A list of frequ
Tim Nugent wrote:
> 2009/5/16 Andreas Metzler
[...]
>> There is a buch of files in src/celeste/ without copyright/license
>> information:
[...]
>> I think this is all original work (probably deemed to small for the
>> license header), Copyright (C) 2008 by Tim Nugent, licensed under
>> GLv2+, is
Hi Andreas,
Yes those are my original files, adding "Copyright (C) 2008 by Tim Nugent,
licensed under
GLv2+" is fine. You are welcome to add this or I can do it.
Cheers,
Tim
2009/5/16 Andreas Metzler
>
> Andreas Metzler wrote:
> > in the process of trying to prepare 0.8.0 for Debian GNU/Linux
Andreas Metzler wrote:
> in the process of trying to prepare 0.8.0 for Debian GNU/Linux I have
> started going over the copyright/license headers. In src/celeste many
> files are missing copyright information. Most of these are files
> imported with minimal changes from Gabor API
> http://www.kun
Hello,
in the process of trying to prepare 0.8.0 for Debian GNU/Linux I have
started going over the copyright/license headers. In src/celeste many
files are missing copyright information. Most of these are files
imported with minimal changes from Gabor API
http://www.kung-foo.tv/gaborapi.php or li
19 matches
Mail list logo
