On Oct 13, 10:52 pm, Harry van der Wolf hvdw...@gmail.com wrote:
For the time being I will await Christoph Spiel's actions as he also
modified the patch for the current enblend version that is being used
but he did not yet add it to the Enblend trunk.
The change has just been
I've just tried to submit a patch for the italian translation of Hugin
from this page http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=77506atid=550443
and I've received an error saying that I need to be registered to
sourceforge to submit it. When is this changed? I'm doing something
wrong or do I
On 13 okt, 19:18, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote:
Also: wxPython has the same widgets as wxWidgets in C++ and one of the
things to consider, since this is becoming a complete rewrite, is to
start from scratch a wxPython GUI to replace the current C++ GUI.
I haven't programmed either wx*,
Am Tuesday 13 October 2009 schrieb allard:
Hi all,
Hi Allard,
I've fixed most of the problems I had building libpano (SVN1093 a.k.a.
beta3) with CMake on windows, but there's one little thing I still
can't get right.
Nice :)
First the solved problems:
I had to replace
Thanks for your rather elaborate answer, Yuv.
Of course you're completely right (and I'm dead serious too, sorry
that I misunderstood). You can never really trust anything you
download, or rely blindly on what a program says to be.
What about a new command line argument --version which gives
Christian,
Last week a new Bug Reporting policy was announced:
http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx/browse_thread/thread/122034ab50b95685?hl=en-GB#
It was in response to there being too many anonymous bug reports
that were incomplete/inconclusive and impossible to follow-up.
I don't
Hi Chris,
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:55:23AM -0700, cspiel wrote:
Oh, I just wanted to follow the DRY principle and to heed Roger's
concerns about the runtime penalty of an if-clause inside the loop
of all snake segments. Nothing fancy, really.
I wasn't concerned about the runtime
On Wed 14-Oct-2009 at 03:52 -0700, cri wrote:
I've just tried to submit a patch for the italian translation of Hugin
from this page http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=77506atid=550443
and I've received an error saying that I need to be registered to
sourceforge to submit it. When is this
Hi,
A correct fix will require determining the cause of the two-point
snake. A two-point polygon has zero area, so it is unclear what region
of the mask this is outlining. Perhaps the mask has isolated
single-pixel spots of black and white? E.g. if the user set the input
alpha masks with
Hi Chris,
I found why you didn't get my mail message: Your mail server refuses
my messages: Your problem!
We get a fixed IP address (always the same) from our provider, so it's
wrong to call this a dynamic IP.
And even if it is a dynamic IP, it is wrong to refuse Email from
those IP
Bruno Postle wrote:
We have far too many anonymous bug reports in the tracker where we
really need to contact the submitter for more information.
that's for the bug tracker.
Sorry, this restriction isn't fine grained enough to only apply to
'bugs' and not 'patches'. You can send me
On Wed 14-Oct-2009 at 10:29 -0400, Nicolas Pelletier wrote:
This is currently set up as a one to one match, but should be a one to many
I think:
The first part could be done with (one per project):
- Many images with control points and aligned with nona
- A single equirectangular
- 6 cube faces
On Wed 14-Oct-2009 at 05:14 -0700, Bart van Andel wrote:
By the way I'm just copying the --version idea from lots of other
tools available everywhere. If so many tools are using it, I reckon it
can't be that bad an idea...
With the current Hugin trunk the command-line tools -h option does
tell
On Tue 13-Oct-2009 at 01:41 -0700, grow wrote:
My experience of the current model is that it is a pipe-line with only
one possible input opening. One variation that I have wished for when
problems arise is provoked by the fact that in the current model
Hugin will give me some of the
It already exists.
http://search.cpan.org/~bpostle/Panotools-Script-0.23/bin/panostart
I believe I used Alexandre Jenny's Autopano on the command line for this
purpose. And generally it worked quite well, as long as panoramas didn't
contain too similar photos.
Anyway I would like to try
AKS-Gmail-IMAP schrieb:
... It is not necessary to wait for the process to compare all 25
images in a project to the 26th image when you know only the Xth image
has points in common with the 26th. If you are using OS X, it is the
Command key that allows one to select multiple images in the
I'm not convinced it is a post processing step. I think it depends on where
we draw the what should hugin do boundary.
I'm currently working with the exact workflow you mentioned, create a 360
180 equi and then use this as the first element in the chain. But if the
other steps were only post
On Wed 14-Oct-2009 at 16:09 -0400, Nicolas Pelletier wrote:
I'm not convinced it is a post processing step. I think it depends on where
we draw the what should hugin do boundary.
I guess that where I'm coming from is that Hugin and the Stitcher
tab are complex enough as it is.
I'm currently
I have been using hugin for about 3 years and follow the development
with a lot of interest.
It would be good if one were to be able to select and move individual
and groups of images in the fast preview window. This would be useful
in the case of sky images with no coherent set of control
do you get more information when running it with -v 1 ?
I'm getting more information with -v 1. It mainly the steps processed
and some statitistics. But it does not help to identify the
parameters:
/snip
Levenberg-Marquardt returned in 45 iterations
reason 2 - stopped by small Dp
start
20 matches
Mail list logo
