I simply don't see why you are attempting to stack day and night pix.
Why don't you just produce two separate panos, same lens and PoV?
Nice effect.
John
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of
He wrote in my case the day shot had 9 hand-held portrait photos and
the night shot had 4 balanced-on-railing landscape photos. This is why
it makes perfect sense to tell hugin to assume two different lenses
for each set of photos.
Nice panoramas, and a useful description.
Carl
John McAllister
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
I've come across two photos that I took and was wondering if Hugin would
be the right tool to merge them into one.
The photos have been taken with a small but noticable change in viewing
direction. Due to this and a very shallow DOF there
Wrong approach for desired result.
Ridiculously over-complicated.
Why don't you just produce two separate panos, same lens and PoV?
John
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked
As I learned in my early days of working with Photoshop (1991): there is
no wrong approach for there are usually several ways to reach the same goal.
If you know an easier solution, feel free to demonstrate it!
Remember: the original poster mentioned that he used portrait photos for
pano #1
What does anyone think about coding Hugin for cluster processing e.g.
using Pooch? Would this be an idea that could go on the Ideas page?
Battle
On Mar 12, 1:40 pm, Bruno Postle brunopos...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 12 March 2010 17:03, Jim Watters jwatt...@photocreations.ca wrote:
The
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Gerhard Killesreiter
gerh...@killesreiter.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
I've come across two photos that I took and was wondering if Hugin would
be the right tool to merge them into one.
The photos have been taken
The proper approach to a project of this kind is careful thought, preparation
and execution.
It is silly to expect to achieve good quality results by the post-hoc
manipulation of imprecise or inconsistent input data.
The easiest approach is to ensure that the images are taken from the same
2010/3/21 Gerry Patterson thedeepvo...@gmail.com
Hello,
Here http://groups.google.com/group/hugin-ptx/web/cactus.jpg is what I
was able to come up with.
1. loaded the images into hugin and created some (3 or 4) control
points manually
2. optimized for positions and XYZ
3.
Gerry Patterson thedeepvo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Gerhard Killesreiter
gerh...@killesreiter.de wrote:
[...]
I've come across two photos that I took and was wondering if Hugin would
be the right tool to merge them into one.
The photos have been taken with a
Hi,
Thanks a lot for your reply.
First, just let me clarify something for everyone, which I should have
done in the previous mail.
The 3D panosphere mode would have very little in common with the current
projection mode. So it will not use the current projection techniques to
display the
On Sun 21-Mar-2010 at 12:40 -0700, Ryan wrote:
The power of post-processing makes it worth taking 30 seconds to
strafe the horizon -- on a whim, with kids in tow, or with a train
pulling in -- when no real setup is feasible now but there will be
time to play around later.
I agree, I have a
On Sat 20-Mar-2010 at 17:15 +0100, Daniel M. German wrote:
[1] http://socghop.appspot.com/gsoc/program/accepted_orgs/google/gsoc2010
I can volunteer as a backup (given my success rate in the previos
years).
Great, can you go to the google app and register as a mentor:
Bruno,
I hate being on the bleeding edge, but I'd like to try some clustered
stitching for a larger project. It looks like distmake requires POSIX
http://distmake.sourceforge.net/pmwiki/pmwiki.php, and it seems
therefore is OSX compatible. Is there any kind of tutorial, manual,
or someone
On Sun, 2010-03-21 at 22:44 +0100, Darko Makreshanski wrote:
The 3D panosphere mode would have very little in common with the current
projection mode. So it will not use the current projection techniques to
display the result (rectilinear for inside and orthographic for outside
look) but
15 matches
Mail list logo
