On Sep 18, 11:47 pm, dmg d...@uvic.ca wrote:
Hi KFJ,
did you try using cmake?
I did not, and I gave it some thought, even looked at cmake's website.
I admit I did not look very intensely, but I got the feeling that it
is more something for MSVC users - please correct me if I'm wrong.
Also I
Am Sonntag 19 September 2010 schrieb kfj:
On Sep 18, 11:47 pm, dmg d...@uvic.ca wrote:
Hi KFJ,
did you try using cmake?
I did not, and I gave it some thought, even looked at cmake's website.
I admit I did not look very intensely, but I got the feeling that it
is more something for
Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
Hugin is a Panorama stitcher and more. A powerful software package
for creating and processing panoramic images.
A hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 (release candidate 1) tarball is available here:
[...]
Uploaded to Debian/experimental.
cu andreas
--
You received
On Sep 19, 8:22 am, Kornel Benko kornel.be...@berlin.de wrote:
3.) packaging debian (You may want red hat, then -DCPACK_BINARY_RPM:BOOL=ON)
Thanks for the prompt reply!
I'm with you until the previous line. I'm not on Linux, I'm on minGw.
I have a POSIX environment (msys) with a bash shell
Am Sonntag 19 September 2010 schrieb kfj:
On Sep 19, 8:22 am, Kornel Benko kornel.be...@berlin.de wrote:
3.) packaging debian (You may want red hat, then
-DCPACK_BINARY_RPM:BOOL=ON)
Thanks for the prompt reply!
I'm with you until the previous line. I'm not on Linux, I'm on minGw.
I have
Hi Harry,
first of all thanks for all the builds and other work on the project!
The (double) 6-core Mac Pro models aren't mentioned in the inventory
poll, I think there is no Mac Pro at all (quad-/6-/8-12-core Xeon).
Mactracker http://www.mactracker.ca/ has a good overview
Assistant tab:
-
Hi Carl,
2010/9/19 Carl von Einem c...@einem.net
Hi Harry,
first of all thanks for all the builds and other work on the project!
The (double) 6-core Mac Pro models aren't mentioned in the inventory poll,
I think there is no Mac Pro at all (quad-/6-/8-12-core Xeon).
Mactracker
On Sep 19, 1:05 pm, Kornel Benko kornel.be...@berlin.de wrote:
Sorry, don't know much about nsis. Except you could use
It is 'msys'. I am not attempting to make a package, just to compile
libpano13 from source, together with it's collateral applications.
msys ('minimal system') is an
Am Sonntag 19 September 2010 schrieb kfj:
On Sep 19, 1:05 pm, Kornel Benko kornel.be...@berlin.de wrote:
Sorry, don't know much about nsis. Except you could use
It is 'msys'. I am not attempting to make a package, just to compile
libpano13 from source, together with it's collateral
I see it now on the PPC, but this is very curious. I figured the
patfree, being a built-in, would show up if I pressed the defaults
button on the PPC test because the patfree was showing up on the Intel
machine, which is Hugin virgin so to speak. So in the PPC test I
chanced loosing all
On September 19, 2010 03:02:04 am Andreas Metzler wrote:
A hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 (release candidate 1) tarball is available here:
[...]
Uploaded to Debian/experimental.
is there a reason why you break the package in three parts [0] [1] [2]?
right now, [0] and [1] give me an error page Package
Harry,
The enblend/enfuse patch works, but there remains a problem on this
Intel (Macmini2,1 10.6.4).
When the stitch involves overwriting, I see in the verbose window
named huginpto_2JUTgZ - Stitching:
echo: write Bad file descriptor
gnumake: *** [test] Error 1
When the stitch does
Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote:
On September 19, 2010 03:02:04 am Andreas Metzler wrote:
A hugin-2010.2.0_rc1 (release candidate 1) tarball is available here:
[...]
Uploaded to Debian/experimental.
is there a reason why you break the package in three parts [0] [1] [2]?
Hello,
hugin-data
Hi,
2010/9/19 AKS-Gmail-IMAP aksei...@gmail.com
Harry,
The enblend/enfuse patch works, but there remains a problem on this Intel
(Macmini2,1 10.6.4).
When the stitch involves overwriting, I see in the verbose window named
huginpto_2JUTgZ - Stitching:
echo: write Bad file descriptor
On Sep 19, 3:38 pm, Kornel Benko kornel.be...@berlin.de wrote:
Say, your main CMakeLists.txt for a project is in /x/source
Normally one only creates a directory, say /x/build
cd /x/build
cmake /x/source
make
make install # this one as a superuser
I tried
Hi,
I pulled and upgraded my 2010.2 branch (in folder hugin-2010.2). Did a
change and pushed it with hg push ssh://user/hgroot/hugin/hugin -b
2010.2 to specifiy the branch. So far so good (it seemed).
I get a mail mentioning in the header:
branch:
details:
On Sun, 2010-09-19 at 19:10 +0200, Harry van der Wolf wrote:
Hi,
I pulled and upgraded my 2010.2 branch (in folder hugin-2010.2). Did a
change and pushed it with hg push ssh://user/hgroot/hugin/hugin -b
2010.2 to specifiy the branch. So far so good (it seemed).
I get a mail mentioning in
Am Sonntag 19 September 2010 schrieb kfj:
On Sep 19, 3:38 pm, Kornel Benko kornel.be...@berlin.de wrote:
Say, your main CMakeLists.txt for a project is in /x/source
Normally one only creates a directory, say /x/build
cd /x/build
cmake /x/source
make
Hi,
2010/9/19 James Legg lankyle...@gmail.com
Unlike SVN, mercurial won't let you blindly push changes when other
changes have been pushed changes since your last update (even if the
files you changed weren't touched by anyone else). You should pull the
latest changes, update, and merge your
Hi Harry,
added 2 changesets with 0 changes to 1 files
Now that's a nice and very clear message 2 changesets with 0 changes to 1
files.
The logic of that is really enlightening. :-)
I think, I'm responsible at least partially for this. I added a tag
for the release candidate. This changes a
Hi Terry,
On September 8, 2010 02:02:40 am Tduell wrote:
I have spent a bit of time lately trying to get a good understanding
of how to work with mosaic mode, all aimed at putting together a
tutorial for the 2010.2 release.
thanks for sharing your experience. I built on it [0].
(1) Set
ciao Emanuele,
On September 15, 2010 09:38:55 am thePanz wrote:
Thank you for importing my NSIS package into SourceForge. I've been
quite busy in latest days, I'll continue posting my updates to SF as
soon as possible.
I'd like to know (I read about this feature on Mercurial website) if
SF
Hullo Yuv,
On Sep 20, 6:35 am, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote:
Hi Terry,
On September 8, 2010 02:02:40 am Tduell wrote:
I have spent a bit of time lately trying to get a good understanding
of how to work with mosaic mode, all aimed at putting together a
tutorial for the 2010.2
Speaking of translations, what is the new translations options on the optimizer
menu? For this sort of thing, not for standard panos?
Dale
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 16:11:08 -0700
Subject: [hugin-ptx] Re: Some thoughts on working with mosaic mode
From: tdu...@iinet.net.au
To:
Hullo Dale,
On Sep 20, 11:05 am, Dale Beams drbe...@hotmail.com wrote:
Speaking of translations, what is the new translations options on the
optimizer menu? For this sort of thing, not for standard panos?
The basic one is 'Positions and Translation (y,p,r,x,y,z)', and
thereafter any that
Let me re-phrase. What is the translation option mean?
Dale
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 18:29:36 -0700
Subject: [hugin-ptx] Re: Some thoughts on working with mosaic mode
From: tdu...@iinet.net.au
To: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
Hullo Dale,
On Sep 20, 11:05 am, Dale Beams
Hullo Dale,
On Sep 20, 1:57 pm, Dale Beams drbe...@hotmail.com wrote:
Let me re-phrase. What is the translation option mean?
Aaah, sorry for misunderstanding your question.
I'll give my simple (?) explanation. Others may be able to elaborate
and/or correct me.
When one shoots a normal pano,
27 matches
Mail list logo
