[hugin-ptx] Windows binaries for Hugin 2010.2.0

2010-10-19 Thread Marius Loots
Hallo Everyone I am having problems with the new release. Have downloaded the binary for Windows (Hugin_2010.2.0_Windows_x32) from sourceforge. Have not been able to get it running on WinXP and Win7. On WinXP sp3, I get the following error: (null) is not a valid Win32 application. On Win7 x32

[hugin-ptx] Re: Ubuntu 10.10, Hugin

2010-10-19 Thread kfj
On 18 Okt., 23:13, Bob Bright bbbri...@gmail.com wrote: There were a couple of dependencies missing from the panoglview instructions on the wiki (libwxgtk2.8-dev and libglew-dev).  I've added them, so you might want to try again. I had those already. It compiles fine, I just don't get it to

[hugin-ptx] Questions about coordinates transforming

2010-10-19 Thread Cugucas
Hi, all I have studied the algorithm of hugin for a week, I focus on the coordinates transforming, I build hugin 2009.4 from source code on MSVC2008 and step in every function, but I'm confused now. Anyone could tell me how a pixel on the original image transformed to the final cylindrical

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin 2010.3.0.rev4462 windows

2010-10-19 Thread Henk Tijdink
I've downloaded and tested this version of Hugin. Downloaded cpfind too. Found the following shortcomings. CPfind works OK in this build and in version 2010.2.0. CPfind with Celeste doesn't work well. Celeste standalone doesn't work well too. same very few control points deleted. Celeste

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Ubuntu 10.10, Hugin

2010-10-19 Thread Dale Beams
KFJ, Do you have a video card with GL, such as Nvidia, etc. which you don't have the drivers loaded? PanoGLView will perform slowly if you don't have the right drivers for you video card. Dale On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 03:37 -0700, kfj wrote: On 18 Okt., 23:13, Bob Bright bbbri...@gmail.com

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: hugin 2010.3.0.rev4462 windows

2010-10-19 Thread Oskar Sander
Cool, what's new in 2010.3 part from the cpfind as compared to the .2 just released? Cheers O 2010/10/19 Henk Tijdink h.tijd...@gmail.com I've downloaded and tested this version of Hugin. Downloaded cpfind too. Found the following shortcomings. CPfind works OK in this build and in

[hugin-ptx] Webspace sought for Autopano-SIFT-C 2.5.1

2010-10-19 Thread Henk Tijdink
Because it is in the end of a thread mentioned I make a new thread. I have build autopano SIFT-C-2.5.1, but have no webspace for straight downloading. The installer for Hugin 210.2.1 for Windows needs Autopano SIFT-C 2.5.1 on a webspace for download. So Matthew Petroff can place his installer on

Re: [hugin-ptx] Webspace sought for Autopano-SIFT-C 2.5.1

2010-10-19 Thread Yuval Levy
On October 19, 2010 11:41:59 am Henk Tijdink wrote: The installer for Hugin 210.2.1 for Windows you mean 2010.2.0 ? please do not change those first three digits, they are a reference to the source code. Feel free to append, e.g. 2010.2.0_w1 or whatever. In the past we used to append a

[hugin-ptx] Re: Webspace sought for Autopano-SIFT-C 2.5.1

2010-10-19 Thread Henk Tijdink
Hello Yuv 2010.2.1 was a typo my side. Further I have no attorneys in my network, so I can't consult them about the legal issues. That is the reason I try to do it this way for finding someone who knows more about the legal ins and outs of the patent outside the US jurisdiction. I know from

[hugin-ptx] Re: Windows binaries for Hugin 2010.2.0

2010-10-19 Thread Matthew Petroff
After doing testing on various computers, it appears that the 7-zip files do not always work properly. Some machines refuse to load the software while others refuse to extract the archive all together. I am in the process of uploading zip files to SourceForge. While they are considerably larger,

[hugin-ptx] Re: Processing time of enfused panos

2010-10-19 Thread tbransco
Sorry for the slow response, but thank you for pointing out the likely culprit. I could have sworn I read to set this parameter in GB, but you are absolutely correct; the reference manual for enblend and enfuse clearly state 'MB' are the correct units. Doh. I just restarted my stitch with -m