Erik Krause wrote:
Am 11.04.2011 10:48, schrieb paul womack:
If I understand you right, a line control can have more than two points
associated with it.
Only straight lines can have more than two points. They are designated
by the same t-number (2). Hugin allows for this, just select the
Ah - hah. So for a multi-point horizon I should make a straight line
which happens to be horizontal?
I found vertical lines work better than straight lines which happen to
be vertical. The images between the horizontal/vertical lines should
be oriented by overlapping normal control points, imo.
I should probably start a new thread for this, but whatever...
Hugin HDR panorama output (2010.4.0) is broken. Whether outputting the
final output as EXR or TIFF, the intermediate stacks are in the EXR
format. For example, ProjectName_stack_hdr_[[:digit:]]{4}.exr. These
intermediate stacks are
I mean to ask, is this known? Is there a workaround? I see no new
versions of enblend...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
I ask because enblend has been running for 18 hours so far
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this
Am 12.04.2011 10:41, schrieb paul womack:
Horizontal lines and vertical lines can have only one pair each.
Ah - hah. So for a multi-point horizon I should make a straight line
which happens to be horizontal?
No, just use multiple pairs of horizontal control points. You can't
force a
Yipee!! :-))
Jeffrey
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To post to this group, send email to
Mikolaj, if you need images for testing, please let me know.
cheers.
Jeffrey
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ
To
i can give you a 700 image set (for example) if you want. email me offlist,
please.
Jeffrey
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
Yes you're right, they're in the wrong order. I will inform the library
people :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
Hi Emaad, you can check the blog post for some technical details. Anyway, it
was Canon 550D and 70-200mm lens @200mm.
Exposure was tricky. The viewfinder showed blown highlights but they weren't
really blown ;-)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Is it possible to create a rectilinear panorama from images (shot from
one location) ranging (tip-to-tip) 67 degrees horizontally and 50
degrees vertically such that the output image plane does not appear to
lean forwards or backwards, but flat as in
Mm sorry FOV ranges from 142 degrees horizontal to 144 degrees
vertical according to the sticther tab... whereas I calculated FOV
from the images tab as (yaw group0 - yaw group1) * (# groups) +
[2-(mod2 #groups)/2](yaw group1 - yaw group1). What is the difference
?
--
You received this message
Btw, this is an awesome image!
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 22:34:45 -0400
Subject: Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Hugin Experience
From: orbisvi...@gmail.com
To: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
Is it possible to create a rectilinear panorama from images (shot from
one location) ranging (tip-to-tip) 67
14 matches
Mail list logo
