Hullo,
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011 12:04:39 +1100, dragonmage dragonm...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi, I have several images of stars to stitch. The field of view is the
same, only a slight movement of stars between frames. I want the
output to be same resolution and also rectangular like the original
Interesting, no idea what caused it. I used it with no problems last
night. On a Debian-sid-based system that hasn't been updated between
then and now. Just exported 4 JPGs from the same (unmodified) raw
photoprocessing program I used before, also on a system that wasn't
updated between then
yes, a little: rectilinear makes the least distortion,
I can get it with the sides concaving in a little but not straght
edged.
The grid overlay shows a spherical shape and I really want a flat
projection.
chris
On Oct 12, 2:55 pm, Terry Duell tdu...@iinet.net.au wrote:
Hullo,
On Wed, 12 Oct
yes, a little: rectilinear makes the least distortion,
I can get it with the sides concaving in a little but not straght
edged.
The grid overlay shows a spherical shape and I really want a flat
projection.
chris
On Oct 12, 2:55 pm, Terry Duell tdu...@iinet.net.au wrote:
Hullo,
On Wed, 12 Oct
2011/10/12 dragonmage dragonm...@gmail.com
yes, a little: rectilinear makes the least distortion,
I can get it with the sides concaving in a little but not straght
edged.
The grid overlay shows a spherical shape and I really want a flat
projection.
chris
On Oct 12, 2:55 pm, Terry Duell
Did some more testing and found some other results. Running nona
against the align.pto file:
nona -o test -g align.pto
will crash three of my machines but will run correctly and finish on
one, all different video cards. These video cards it crashes:
nona: using graphics card: NVIDIA
On Oct 9, 3:18 pm, Karmadillo directrix.digi...@gmail.com wrote:
Frequently I need to change the projection of an image, or transform
the image to be in a different region of the existing projection.
However I haven't been able to get this to work with EXR (32 bit)
files. According to the
