On 30 Dez., 22:49, Calvin McDonald c...@ckmcdonald.com wrote:
One last question. Back on the thought that something very unusual is
wrong What would happen if the focal length of a zoom lens were to
change just a bit between a pair of otherwise identical exposure-stacked
images? I ask
http://horman.net/multiblend/multiblend0.1a.tar.gz
I've included my build command, which was just
g++ -ltiff -msse2 -O2 multiblend.cpp
though I have libtiff-devel installed from an RPM, so I'm not sure
what hoops others may have to jump through to get it working.
Trying to compile it with -O3
I agree that in theory this seems to be the best way to do it, however
once I select exposure corrected
The HDR file format section is greyed out, so I only get the LDR file
format options of JPEG, PNG, and TIFF.
The prevents me from stitching EXR to EXR.
On Dec 29, 10:11 am, Bruno Postle
Hi,
2011/12/31 Monkey davidhorma...@gmail.com
http://horman.net/multiblend/multiblend0.1a.tar.gz
I've included my build command, which was just
g++ -ltiff -msse2 -O2 multiblend.cpp
though I have libtiff-devel installed from an RPM, so I'm not sure
what hoops others may have to jump
Am Samstag, 31. Dezember 2011 um 14:20:05, schrieb Harry van der Wolf
hvdw...@gmail.com
Hi,
2011/12/31 Monkey davidhorma...@gmail.com
http://horman.net/multiblend/multiblend0.1a.tar.gz
I've included my build command, which was just
g++ -ltiff -msse2 -O2 multiblend.cpp
though
2011/12/31 Kornel Benko kornel.be...@berlin.de
I have no error if using
g++ -msse2 -O2 multiblend.cpp -ltiff -ltiffxx
on ubuntu 11.10
Kornel
Thank you. You hit a blind spot. It now works on my Lubuntu 11.10 as well.
Unfortunately it doesn't change a thing on OSX.
Hary
2011/12/31 Harry van der Wolf hvdw...@gmail.com
2011/12/31 Kornel Benko kornel.be...@berlin.de
I have no error if using
g++ -msse2 -O2 multiblend.cpp -ltiff -ltiffxx
on ubuntu 11.10
Kornel
Thank you. You hit a blind spot. It now works on my Lubuntu 11.10 as well.
Harry, thanks for the OSX patch - I've added it to the source and
updated the tar.gz (http://horman.net/multiblend/
multiblend0.1a.tar.gz)
Just to be clear though, it compiles and works okay on OSX if you
specify the full path to tiffio.h (and include your malloc patch)?
Sorry for the problems -
2011/12/31 Monkey davidhorma...@gmail.com
Harry, thanks for the OSX patch - I've added it to the source and
updated the tar.gz (http://horman.net/multiblend/
multiblend0.1a.tar.gz)
Just to be clear though, it compiles and works okay on OSX if you
specify the full path to tiffio.h (and
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 03:42:35PM +0100, Harry van der Wolf wrote:
I have now also compiled multiblend for i386 and x86_64 for OSX. I don't
think ppc will succeed as sse2 is not supported on ppc.
The code just uses some optimizations that can easily be written out
for other processors.
For
Hi David,
2011/12/31 Monkey davidhorma...@gmail.com
Harry, thanks for the OSX patch - I've added it to the source and
updated the tar.gz (http://horman.net/multiblend/
multiblend0.1a.tar.gz)
David
I'm very sorry but I sent you the first patch instead of the second. The
memalign function
Hi David,
Maybe not yet clear to you, but my results/remarks/questions/b.llsh.t is
always related to Mac OS X.
I built multiblend now also universal, but only for intel. When building
universal for multiple architectures I can't use -O2 optimization either as
it segfaults as well. It's now at -O.
Hi Harry,
Thanks for the update on the patch - I've made the change and
reuploaded.
multiblend is indeed much, much faster then enblend. From the 3 comparing
tests the resulting images were equal to me w.r.t. seams and so on.
For a fair comparison (though it probably won't make much
Hi David,
2011/12/31 Monkey davidhorma...@gmail.com
multiblend is indeed much, much faster then enblend. From the 3 comparing
tests the resulting images were equal to me w.r.t. seams and so on.
For a fair comparison (though it probably won't make much difference),
you should run Enblend
Kay
On Saturday, December 31, 2011 1:26:32 AM UTC-7, kfj wrote:
Reading your more detailed description, I actually had the same idea.
The pattern of CP misalignment looks like it might have been the
result of a slight change in focal length between the first and second
series. Luckily this
15 matches
Mail list logo
