Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: hugin produces bad picture

2017-10-17 Thread Gunter Königsmann
On 18.10.2017 05:51, Alexander Rabtchevich wrote: > I'm afraid some changes in the image size can lead to disappearing of > the red spot. At least I recall the same workaround worked previously. > But it is not the solution. > Individual bright white and red pixels that disappear when scaling

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin produces bad picture

2017-10-17 Thread Alexander Rabtchevich
I'm afraid some changes in the image size can lead to disappearing of the red spot. At least I recall the same workaround worked previously. But it is not the solution. -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin produces bad picture

2017-10-17 Thread 'dkloi' via hugin and other free panoramic software
Here's a downscaled version of the 24202 pixel wide stitch. Hugin 2017.0.0.eac5e8cc546e on Windows 10 Ent 64 bit. Don't see any problems. CPFind, added some VCPs,

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin produces bad picture

2017-10-17 Thread T. Modes
Am Dienstag, 17. Oktober 2017 21:01:52 UTC+2 schrieb Alexander Rabtchevich: > > Could you please specify the required steps? Should I upload two first > images or scale them and upload scaled ones? > If you can reproduce the issue with the downscaled images it would be fine if you could

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin produces bad picture

2017-10-17 Thread Alexander Rabtchevich
Could you please specify the required steps? Should I upload two first images or scale them and upload scaled ones? вторник, 17 октября 2017 г., 19:44:54 UTC+3 пользователь T. Modes написал: > > > > Am Dienstag, 17. Oktober 2017 18:32:59 UTC+2 schrieb Alexander Rabtchevich: >> >> Here is a the

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin produces bad picture

2017-10-17 Thread T. Modes
Am Dienstag, 17. Oktober 2017 18:32:59 UTC+2 schrieb Alexander Rabtchevich: > > Here is a the link to original files. It is possible to reproduce > exporting. > Sorry, but this is to big. I don't want to download 1 GB. >From the originals 2 images would be sufficient (e.g. DSC03288 and

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin produces bad picture

2017-10-17 Thread Alexander Rabtchevich
Here is a the link to original files. It is possible to reproduce exporting. https://yadi.sk/d/um_AyDWy3NqRLZhttps://yadi.sk/d/um_AyDWy3NqRLZ https://yadi.sk/d/um_AyDWy3NqRLZ https://yadi.sk/d/um_AyDWy3NqRLZ вторник, 17 октября 2017 г., 19:06:12 UTC+3 пользователь T. Modes написал: > > Strange,

[hugin-ptx] Re: hugin produces bad picture

2017-10-17 Thread T. Modes
Strange, Am Dienstag, 17. Oktober 2017 17:25:58 UTC+2 schrieb Alexander Rabtchevich: > > Hello > > Here is a scaled down picture, produced with hugin 2017.1.0.64cc39ce23d4 . > The result doesn't depend on the type of blending software - internal one > or enblend-mp and enfuse-mp are used. The

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Converting Hugin pto lens parameters to OpenCV compatible ones

2017-10-17 Thread T. Modes
Am Montag, 16. Oktober 2017 22:49:55 UTC+2 schrieb Iacovlev Pavel: > > Full frame fisheye ? is that it ? not 100% sure. > For a full frame fisheye (but not e.g. for the stereographic fisheye) the following equation should be correct from Hugins point of view: var focalLengthMm = sensorSizeX /