Re: [hugin-ptx] [Feature request]: Circle brush eraser for control points

I've only done python code so far and have zero C++ knowledge. But if someone knows how to do it but needs the funding I can help with that. -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_FAQ --- You received this message because you are subscribed to t

Re: [hugin-ptx] [Feature request]: Circle brush eraser for control points

On Monday, 1 February 2021 at 0:25:51 +, Hugin developers list wrote: > I take many nature landscape panoramas in which most features are > not straight like buildings. So when I want to remove CPs, the > rectangle selection (Ctrl + right click) is unhandy, as I have to > draw many rectangles

[hugin-ptx] [Feature request]: Circle brush eraser for control points

I take many nature landscape panoramas in which most features are not straight like buildings. So when I want to remove CPs, the rectangle selection (Ctrl + right click) is unhandy, as I have to draw many rectangles to erase points on, say, a single tree. If there was a circular brush tool to e

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: [Request]: Resolve confusion between "Distance" and "Correlation"

I'm afraid you misunderstood a few parts. Yes, parallax doesn't affect correlation and yes a single CP has a low influence on the optimizer. As I understand the optimizer, it prefers what satisfies the larger number of CPs. If it has to chose between satisfying a few CPs in the trees or many CPs

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: [Request]: Resolve confusion between "Distance" and "Correlation"

ChameleonScales schrieb am Sonntag, 31. Januar 2021 um 19:15:50 UTC+1: > calculation of the correlation is expensive > > I assumed the correlation was also calculated when you detect CPs. That > said I didn't necessarily mean to show it at all times. Just when you press > Fine-tune all would b

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: [Request]: Resolve confusion between "Distance" and "Correlation"

> This is a bug, I will fix it. Cool, thank you! > calculation of the correlation is expensive I assumed the correlation was also calculated when you detect CPs. That said I didn't necessarily mean to show it at all times. Just when you press Fine-tune all would be enough, but still in a separ

[hugin-ptx] Re: [Request]: Resolve confusion between "Distance" and "Correlation"

ChameleonScales schrieb am Sonntag, 31. Januar 2021 um 16:54:09 UTC+1: > So I was using the Debian repository version (2018) and in this version > the header did not change to "Correlation". I just tried on the latest > appimage and indeed this has been solved, so that's my mistake. > So you a

[hugin-ptx] [Request]: Resolve confusion between "Distance" and "Correlation"

> with cpfind or other the function "fine-tune all" is not needed at all Ok, but seeing the correlation lets you know if, for example, the wind moves plants and the control point patterns are less alike than in other areas -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.pa

[hugin-ptx] [Request]: Resolve confusion between "Distance" and "Correlation"

Ok, a few things: So I was using the Debian repository version (2018) and in this version the header did not change to "Correlation". I just tried on the latest appimage and indeed this has been solved, so that's my mistake. However, on this same appimage ([20210130)](https://github.com/aferrero

[hugin-ptx] Re: [Request]: Resolve confusion between "Distance" and "Correlation"

ChameleonScales schrieb am Samstag, 30. Januar 2021 um 20:54:39 UTC+1: > As this wiki page > > explains, after Fine-tuning all Points, the Distance column shows the > correlation. I find this confusing. Distance and corr