On Tuesday, August 9, 2022 at 1:38:07 PM UTC-4 Florian Königstein wrote:
> Some time ago I tried whether analytical calculation of the partial
> derivatives is better (faster convergence). I wrote code for analytical
> calculation (via automatic differentiation), but it seemed that there was
On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 12:12 PM Florian Königstein
wrote:
> The image DSC00293.JPG was missing. I took the image DSC00289.JPG as a
> (false) replacement for it.
> First, there are about 20 CPs with distances of about >9000. They are
> totally wrong correspondences. I deleted them.
>
I really
Some time ago I tried whether analytical calculation of the partial
derivatives is better (faster convergence). I wrote code for analytical
calculation (via automatic differentiation), but it seemed that there was
no advantage (longer time and little or no reduction in the number of
The image DSC00293.JPG was missing. I took the image DSC00289.JPG as a
(false) replacement for it.
First, there are about 20 CPs with distances of about >9000. They are
totally wrong correspondences. I deleted them.
I tested optimization only on Hugin++. It took about 10 seconds on my
computer
I worried this sidetrack of the discussion may be stopping someone who
knows more about the answers I'm looking for from replying in this thread.
I really want a better understanding of why results differ so much in the
same optimization problem among version and builds of pano13 (and maybe of
