Re: [hugin-ptx] [Request]: Resolve confusion between "Distance" and "Correlation"

I did not know that. Thanks. I use DxO to make sure the images are as free from camera and lens distortion as possible. I think hugin can then do its magic a bit better. ⁣Don​ On Feb. 15, 2021, 3:44 a.m., at 3:44 a.m., Klaus Foehl wrote: >Hello, > >On 09.02.21 04:28, dgjohnston wrote: >> Bef

Re: [hugin-ptx] [Request]: Resolve confusion between "Distance" and "Correlation"

Hello, On 09.02.21 04:28, dgjohnston wrote: Before I use hugin I usually use DxO PhotoLab to correct for lens and camera body distortion. Does anyone know if DxO uses the Brown-Conrady lens model for their routines or anything similar? You probably know that hugin uses "abc" of which only b i

Re: [hugin-ptx] [Request]: Resolve confusion between "Distance" and "Correlation"

"Fine tune all points" is usable. I often make two versions of the same panorama, with and without Fine tune. It is often visible on the preview, that the panorama layout changes after fine tuning. When adding control points manually, a human selects the most sharp edges and the highest contrast

Re: [hugin-ptx] [Request]: Resolve confusion between "Distance" and "Correlation"

On Monday, 8 February 2021 at 21:28:45 -0600, dgjohnston wrote: > Before I use hugin I usually use DxO PhotoLab to correct for lens > and camera body distortion. Yes, I do that too. > Does anyone know if DxO uses the Brown-Conrady lens model for their > routines or anything similar? The DxO dev

Re: [hugin-ptx] [Request]: Resolve confusion between "Distance" and "Correlation"

Before I use hugin I usually use DxO PhotoLab to correct for lens and camera body distortion. Does anyone know if DxO uses the Brown-Conrady lens model for their routines or anything similar? In the wikipedia entry for “Distortion” there is one comment about this: DxO Labs

[hugin-ptx] [Request]: Resolve confusion between "Distance" and "Correlation"

> with cpfind or other the function "fine-tune all" is not needed at all Ok, but seeing the correlation lets you know if, for example, the wind moves plants and the control point patterns are less alike than in other areas -- A list of frequently asked questions is available at: http://wiki.pa

[hugin-ptx] [Request]: Resolve confusion between "Distance" and "Correlation"

Ok, a few things: So I was using the Debian repository version (2018) and in this version the header did not change to "Correlation". I just tried on the latest appimage and indeed this has been solved, so that's my mistake. However, on this same appimage ([20210130)](https://github.com/aferrero

[hugin-ptx] [Request]: Resolve confusion between "Distance" and "Correlation"

As [this wiki page](http://hugin.sourceforge.net/docs/manual/Hugin_Control_Points_table.html) explains, after Fine-tuning all Points, the Distance column shows the correlation. I find this confusing. Distance and correlation are not the same thing. Would it be possible to instead add a Correlat