johnfi...@gmail.com schrieb am Samstag, 5. Februar 2022 um 14:49:42 UTC+1:
> Yes. That does work. I was intending to do something that works much
> better than that. I wanted the feature committed before I start on the
> performance increase.
Don't rely on to be written code. Nobody knows
On Saturday, February 5, 2022 at 8:35:00 AM UTC-5 gunter.ko...@gmail.com
wrote:
> Could wxImage::GetSubImage and then scaling the resulting portion of the
> original image in CpImgCtl::OnDraw do the trick?
>
Yes. That does work. I was intending to do something that works much
better than
Could wxImage::GetSubImage and then scaling the resulting portion of the
original image in CpImgCtl::OnDraw do the trick?
Am 5. Februar 2022 13:04:25 MEZ schrieb "johnfi...@gmail.com"
:
>On the branch with my previous CP Editor change, I pushed code to provide
>400% and 800% zoom choices.
>
On the branch with my previous CP Editor change, I pushed code to provide
400% and 800% zoom choices.
*slow and ugly:*
Currently, 400% and 800% are slow and ugly. I have plans for changing both
those things.
But I have been using them this way for a while, and for my use having
those choices
