Thanks. To my kids I call this jiggling the handle. I will try that.
On Saturday, September 4, 2021 at 3:00:38 AM UTC-5 bruno...@gmail.com wrote:
> This is a long-standing bug in enblend that appears when the seam lines
> get more complex.
>
> Workarounds are to change some aspect of the panoram
This is a long-standing bug in enblend that appears when the seam lines get
more complex.
Workarounds are to change some aspect of the panorama a small amount, for me,
just rearranging the order of the input photos generally works ok.
Alternatively, the internal Hugin blender doesn't have as ma
Sorry if I explained poorly, and pardon my delay.
I believe I do mean an entire black rectangular (or, you know, warped
rectangular) frame-- as if one of the 38 JPEGs I shot (to make one sphere)
was replaced with an all-black JPEG just before Hugin made the final pano.
In the final pano the bl
I compiled Hugin 2020 on Debian Linux here and use it now. Comments
interspersed below.
On 8/26/21 8:03 AM, Robb Campbell wrote:
I saw that. That could be part of it.
It sounded like a part of the problem.
I get weird failure to see what are apparently obvious potential
control points.
I'
I saw that. That could be part of it. I get weird failure to see what are
apparently obvious potential control points. I also get final panoramas
with black panes.
On Thursday, August 26, 2021 at 2:04:51 AM UTC-5 GnomeNomad wrote:
> Does this sound like your issue?
>
> "Fixes fast preview on H
Does this sound like your issue?
"Fixes fast preview on HiDPI screens under GTK+3 and MacOS."
From the list of changes since v2019.2.0
On 8/25/21 2:32 PM, Robb Campbell wrote:
I don't know.
On Sunday, August 22, 2021 at 10:17:34 PM UTC-5 GnomeNomad wrote:
I seem to recall that the Hugin
I don't know.
On Sunday, August 22, 2021 at 10:17:34 PM UTC-5 GnomeNomad wrote:
> I seem to recall that the Hugin team doesn't have anyone with a Mac
> build environment?
>
> On 8/22/21 11:59 AM, Robb Campbell wrote:
> > Thanks, I didn't notice that mine is actually the 2019. I can find a
> > s
I seem to recall that the Hugin team doesn't have anyone with a Mac
build environment?
On 8/22/21 11:59 AM, Robb Campbell wrote:
Thanks, I didn't notice that mine is actually the 2019. I can find a
source code / tarball for the 2020 version (I'm probably using the wrong
words), but not a binar
Thanks, I didn't notice that mine is actually the 2019. I can find a source
code / tarball for the 2020 version (I'm probably using the wrong words),
but not a binary / executable.
On Tuesday, August 17, 2021 at 2:09:52 AM UTC-5 GnomeNomad wrote:
> Hmm, 2019? I don't have a Mac, but current ver
Hmm, 2019? I don't have a Mac, but current version of Hugin is 2020:
http://hugin.sourceforge.net/releases/2020.0.0/en.shtml
On 8/16/21 12:47 PM, Robb Campbell wrote:
So . . . does anyone have any information on this? I have very much the
same problem. Hugin (2019, Mac) can't load images into a
So . . . does anyone have any information on this? I have very much the
same problem. Hugin (2019, Mac) can't load images into a preview the way it
could before (2012, Mac). The individual images are scrambled like a
Fifteen Puzzle and the Layout has a bunch of wrong links. Apparently a
failure
Thanks for all your help
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 14, 2021, at 7:35 PM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, 14 July 2021 at 16:35:03 -0400, Hugin developers list wrote:
>> Thank you. Yes, Affinity uses control points very similar to Hugin.
>> I did not bother to insert CPs because
On Wednesday, 14 July 2021 at 16:35:03 -0400, Hugin developers list wrote:
> Thank you. Yes, Affinity uses control points very similar to Hugin.
> I did not bother to insert CPs because I was only trying to point out that
> Hugin was having trouble finding the cPs, but Affinity had no such problem
Thank you. Yes, Affinity uses control points very similar to Hugin.
I did not bother to insert CPs because I was only trying to point out that
Hugin was having trouble finding the cPs, but Affinity had no such problem.
Being able to use Hugin is still my choice (when it works) because it has fewer
On Wed, 14 Jul 2021 at 15:39, 'Stanley Green' via hugin and other free
panoramic software wrote:
>
> Thank you for your suggestion.
> In case you did not notice, the same three images were used successfully to
> stitch a panorama in Affinity without manually adding control points.
In case you di
Thank you for your suggestion.
In case you did not notice, the same three images were used successfully to
stitch a panorama in Affinity without manually adding control points.
> On Jul 14, 2021, at 9:25 AM, Klaus Foehl wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Are you familiar with the concept of CP - Control Po
16 matches
Mail list logo
