Re: [hugin-ptx] Lens calibrating in comparison with JPG-out-of-cam and uncorrected RAW-processing

2013-10-10 Thread David W. Jones
On 10/08/2013 08:56 AM, Peter Suetterlin wrote: Gnome Nomad wrote: Maybe new cameras are fancier now, but I'm highly doubtful that any of them can do any correction for lens distortion. Of course, probably someone knows different. Or some camera makers marketing departments are run by lunatics

Re: [hugin-ptx] Lens calibrating in comparison with JPG-out-of-cam and uncorrected RAW-processing

2013-10-08 Thread Peter Suetterlin
Gnome Nomad wrote: Maybe new cameras are fancier now, but I'm highly doubtful that any of them can do any correction for lens distortion. Of course, probably someone knows different. Or some camera makers marketing departments are run by lunatics ... At least for the MFT (Micro Four Third)

Re: [hugin-ptx] Lens calibrating in comparison with JPG-out-of-cam and uncorrected RAW-processing

2013-07-05 Thread Bruno Postle
On 4 Jul 2013 13:48, Florian H wrote: So yesterday I asked myself: Is it possible to figure out the camera-intern control parameters for lens correction with out-of-the-box-JPGs? The Idea is to shot for each focal length ONE photo and let it save by the camera as RAW and (lens-corrected) JPG.

Re: [hugin-ptx] Lens calibrating in comparison with JPG-out-of-cam and uncorrected RAW-processing

2013-07-05 Thread Gnome Nomad
On 07/04/2013 10:44 PM, paul womack wrote: Bruno Postle wrote: On 4 Jul 2013 13:48, Florian H wrote: So yesterday I asked myself: Is it possible to figure out the camera-intern control parameters for lens correction with out-of-the-box-JPGs? The Idea is to shot for each focal length ONE

Re: [hugin-ptx] Lens calibrating in comparison with JPG-out-of-cam and uncorrected RAW-processing

2013-07-05 Thread Bruno Postle
On 5 Jul 2013 10:43, Gnome Nomad wrote: Maybe new cameras are fancier now, but I'm highly doubtful that any of them can do any correction for lens distortion. Of course, probably someone knows different. Or some camera makers marketing departments are run by lunatics ... My (getting elderly

Re: [hugin-ptx] Lens calibrating in comparison with JPG-out-of-cam and uncorrected RAW-processing

2013-07-05 Thread Gnome Nomad
On 07/04/2013 11:51 PM, Bruno Postle wrote: On 5 Jul 2013 10:43, Gnome Nomad wrote: Maybe new cameras are fancier now, but I'm highly doubtful that any of them can do any correction for lens distortion. Of course, probably someone knows different. Or some camera makers marketing departments

Re: [hugin-ptx] Lens calibrating in comparison with JPG-out-of-cam and uncorrected RAW-processing

2013-07-05 Thread Carl von Einem
Bruno Postle schrieb am 05.07.13 11:51: On 5 Jul 2013 10:43, Gnome Nomad wrote: Maybe new cameras are fancier now, but I'm highly doubtful that any of them can do any correction for lens distortion. Of course, probably someone knows different. Or some camera makers marketing departments are

Re: [hugin-ptx] Lens calibrating in comparison with JPG-out-of-cam and uncorrected RAW-processing

2013-07-05 Thread Rogier Wolff
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 10:51:03AM +0100, Bruno Postle wrote: On 5 Jul 2013 10:43, Gnome Nomad wrote: Maybe new cameras are fancier now, but I'm highly doubtful that any of them can do any correction for lens distortion. Of course, probably someone knows different. Or some camera makers

[hugin-ptx] Lens calibrating in comparison with JPG-out-of-cam and uncorrected RAW-processing

2013-07-04 Thread Florian H
Hi there, first of all: Thanks to all developers for these great bunch of tools! Amazing, what is possible by only using open-source in the meanwhile. But there is at least one big drawback for me: Working with RAW Images on uncommercial software causes problems with lens distortion. I tried