Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Suggestion

2016-08-07 23:47 GMT+02:00 Michael Havens : > I found the control points. Of the three pictures one of them would not do > it automatically so I inserted a couple manually. As for verifying the ones > it found automatically I didn't inspect them other than glancing at

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Suggestion

>> Now that I think of it I don't know what I was thinking! What I meant >by >that is you have control point 'x' and 'y' on one picture and you have >the >corresponding 'x' and 'y' points on the other picture. but the second >x/y >points were taken at a different zoom factor... you know what I

[hugin-ptx] Re: Suggestion

> > > What maybe someone could do is make it so control points from images > > proportionally scale to fit together. > > Others have addressed your probable issues, but I'm still left > wondering what you mean with this suggestion. Can you elaborate? > > Now that I think of it I don't know

[hugin-ptx] Re: Suggestion

thank you all for your assistance. I like the idea of using dt to correct distortion. but I just spent a little time playing with the lens calibration. How should I reset that back to its original state? While I mentioned that I tried calibrating this with a starburst image. The corrected

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Suggestion

On August 7, 2016 6:23:04 PM EDT, Michael Havens wrote: >I figured out lens distortion but what should I take a picture of? I >think >that image with lines radiating from a central point. What do you know? >I >just took a picture of my monitor. with that it found two x

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Suggestion

I figured out lens distortion but what should I take a picture of? I think that image with lines radiating from a central point. What do you know? I just took a picture of my monitor. with that it found two x axis lines and one y. On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 5:47 PM, Michael Havens

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Suggestion

I found the control points. Of the three pictures one of them would not do it automatically so I inserted a couple manually. As for verifying the ones it found automatically I didn't inspect them other than glancing at them and seeing they appeared correct. How do I figure out lens distortion?

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Suggestion

Hi Michael On 07.08.2016 18:02, Michael Havens wrote: > Here are the photos and stitced picture. > https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B2xvsVTZy4y1T0NsMkdOdGo2TWs >From what I understand from the pics you have posted (and thank you for not sending them out to everyone on this mailing list but

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Suggestion

On August 7, 2016 12:02:16 PM EDT, Michael Havens wrote: >Here are the photos and stitced picture. >https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B2xvsVTZy4y1T0NsMkdOdGo2TWs > >On Sunday, August 7, 2016 at 11:32:43 AM UTC-4, Michael Havens wrote: >> >> Hello gentlemen (and women),

[hugin-ptx] Re: Suggestion

Here are the photos and stitced picture. https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B2xvsVTZy4y1T0NsMkdOdGo2TWs On Sunday, August 7, 2016 at 11:32:43 AM UTC-4, Michael Havens wrote: > > Hello gentlemen (and women), > > I take pictures of the interior of houses. I use hugin in lew of > purchasing a wide

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Suggestion re hugin 2013 beta 1

I forgive you! Thanks, I kicked it up to 100% where it belongs IMHO. On 03/26/2013 12:18 PM, Donald Johnston wrote: 70% because it was version 0.7! ;o) Sorry … it had to be said. On 2013-03-26, at 11:03 AM, T. Modes thomas.mo...@gmx.de wrote: Hmmm. Here, the Simple interface's optimal size

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Suggestion re hugin 2013 beta 1

Great explanation! :-) And it's so much easier to understand than e.g. http://wiki.panotools.org/Diffraction#Resolution http://wiki.panotools.org/Hugin_Preferences#Auto_align This reminded me of something similarly elegant, the compression haiku by Bradford Bohonus, posted a long time ago on

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Suggestion re hugin 2013 beta 1

On 03/25/2013 06:40 AM, T. Modes wrote: On 25 Mrz., 04:34, Gnome Nomad gnomeno...@gmail.com wrote: On the screen you see after pressing the Create Panorama button, there are two spin boxes for setting size. Could we have an Optimal Size button, please? Thanks. When this dialog is shown, the

[hugin-ptx] Re: Suggestion re hugin 2013 beta 1

Hmmm. Here, the Simple interface's optimal size (1553x284, as indicated by the spinners) is noticeably smaller than the optimal size (2266x727, as calculated by the button on the Stitch tab of the Advanced interface). That's the downscale factor: 70 % as default. As already written. I

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Suggestion re hugin 2013 beta 1

Gnome Nomad schrieb am 26.03.13 11:13: On 03/25/2013 06:40 AM, T. Modes wrote: On 25 Mrz., 04:34, Gnome Nomad gnomeno...@gmail.com wrote: On the screen you see after pressing the Create Panorama button, there are two spin boxes for setting size. Could we have an Optimal Size button, please?

Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Suggestion re hugin 2013 beta 1

70% because it was version 0.7! ;o) Sorry … it had to be said. On 2013-03-26, at 11:03 AM, T. Modes thomas.mo...@gmx.de wrote: Hmmm. Here, the Simple interface's optimal size (1553x284, as indicated by the spinners) is noticeably smaller than the optimal size (2266x727, as calculated by the

[hugin-ptx] Re: Suggestion re hugin 2013 beta 1

On 25 Mrz., 04:34, Gnome Nomad gnomeno...@gmail.com wrote: On the screen you see after pressing the Create Panorama button, there are two spin boxes for setting size. Could we have an Optimal Size button, please? Thanks. When this dialog is shown, the output size is already set to the