On 19 Okt., 16:24, Dale Beams drbe...@hotmail.com wrote:
KFJ,
Do you have a video card with GL, such as Nvidia, etc. which you don't
have the drivers loaded? PanoGLView will perform slowly if you don't
have the right drivers for you video card.
I have chipset graphics. intel 945 GM, if
My personal experience with ...Intel 945 board has compatibility issues
with Hugin. But It was in windows only . I have checked it under ubuntu and
same vga works perfectly.
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 8:55 PM, kfj _...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 19 Okt., 16:24, Dale Beams drbe...@hotmail.com
On 18 Okt., 23:13, Bob Bright bbbri...@gmail.com wrote:
There were a couple of dependencies missing from the panoglview
instructions on the wiki (libwxgtk2.8-dev and libglew-dev). I've added
them, so you might want to try again.
I had those already. It compiles fine, I just don't get it to
KFJ,
Do you have a video card with GL, such as Nvidia, etc. which you don't
have the drivers loaded? PanoGLView will perform slowly if you don't
have the right drivers for you video card.
Dale
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 03:37 -0700, kfj wrote:
On 18 Okt., 23:13, Bob Bright bbbri...@gmail.com
There were a couple of dependencies missing from the panoglview
instructions on the wiki (libwxgtk2.8-dev and libglew-dev). I've added
them, so you might want to try again.
Cheers,
BBB
--
Bob Bright
Vancouver Island Digital Imaging
http://VictoriaVR.ca
On 10-10-17 02:20 AM, kfj wrote:
On 16 Okt., 21:58, Dale Beams drbe...@hotmail.com wrote:
I've had an exhausting week, and have decided to rest before i collapse. I
do know that hugin will build. Make sure you have gettext and look through
the list of wx stuff ... sudo aptitude search wx
Hi Dale!
Please don't stress
On 17 Okt., 00:56, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote:
@Dale: I find your activity to be spurious, random, conducive to confusion at
best, and to damage otherwise. Whether it is about build instructions or the
distribution of deb packages. Would you please stop and validate with more
On 17 Okt., 04:01, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote:
You are free to do what you want on your website and with your resources.
Lemmings are free to follow each other to the abyss. For those not wanting to
build to use new features there are better options. They are now documented
on the
On 17 Okt., 12:16, kfj _...@yahoo.com wrote:
I'm back on track! :) Now I'll see if I can build panoGLView as well.
still no joy with panoglview. Does this look familiar to anyone:
k...@anja:~/src/panoglview/pglv.hg$ panoglview ~/Bilder/*4/*_fused.tif
The program 'panoglview' received an X
On 17 Okt., 04:11, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote:
For viewing the panos (and more), I highly recommend Panini. I've added the
instruction on the wiki page [0]
Yuv
Managed to build and install Panini, but it does very odd things to my
spherical 360X180 panorama. And it's a bit rough,
On 17 Okt., 13:21, kfj _...@yahoo.com wrote:
Managed to build and install Panini, but it does very odd things to my
spherical 360X180 panorama.
I used the 'sherical' setting for my image, since it's a spherical
panorama, after all. Using the equirectangular setting, it displays
correctly
On October 17, 2010 05:25:55 am kfj wrote:
oops... maybe I've been barking up the wrong tree all along. Sorry for
all the noise I created because of my naively following the wiki and
installing Dale's packets. I'll start afresh.
don't worry. as the Italian say goes: can che abbaia non morde
On 17 Okt., 14:55, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote:
sorry to read this. No, the error message does not look familiar to me. It
seems to be a runtime error. Have you tried with a jpeg image? or a tiff with
different compression? I have not tried panoglview in more than two years...
the
On 14 Okt., 18:00, Dale Beams drbe...@hotmail.com wrote:
Located it. Needed dependency wx-i18n. Updated wiki.
...
I use a VirtualBox vm with a fresh install of Ubuntu 10.10 for both build
and installation. My build and installations are clean. Then I'll
...
Hi Dale!
I tried to step in your
On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 06:39 -0700, kfj wrote:
On 14 Okt., 18:00, Dale Beams drbe...@hotmail.com wrote:
Located it. Needed dependency wx-i18n. Updated wiki.
...
I use a VirtualBox vm with a fresh install of Ubuntu 10.10 for both build
and installation. My build and installations are
Thanks for the advice. I couldn't help pottering with the sources, and
I can't get rid of the feeling that something has changed in
wxWidgets. I haven't managed to figure it out, but all the other
builds that fail seem to also be stuck somewhere in the wx code.
I'm using your 2010.3.0 build, so
before i collapse. I do
know that hugin will build. Make sure you have gettext and look through the
list of wx stuff ... sudo aptitude search wx
Dale
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 11:55:31 -0700
Subject: [hugin-ptx] Re: Ubuntu 10.10, Hugin
From: _...@yahoo.com
To: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
Thanks
complete solution and will pick items that apt-get doesn't. As a
result I've only been adding those dependencies which have shown
deficient in aptitude.
Dale
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 08:17:13 -0700
Subject: [hugin-ptx] Re: Ubuntu 10.10, Hugin
From: _...@yahoo.com
To: hugin-ptx
Hi Bob,
On October 16, 2010 06:10:22 pm Bob Bright wrote:
Dale: It doesn't matter whether you use aptitude or apt-get -- there's
no such package as 'wx-i18n'. And as kfj has already noted, installing
wx2.8-i18n doesn't help with the build.
The missing dependency is in fact libwxgtk2.8-dev.
, and that's what
freedom is about. Isn't it great!
Dale
From: goo...@levy.ch
To: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Ubuntu 10.10, Hugin
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 18:56:44 -0400
Hi Bob,
On October 16, 2010 06:10:22 pm Bob Bright wrote:
Dale: It doesn't matter whether you
according to the canonical way of building packages.
Yuv
[0]
http://wiki.panotools.org/wiki/index.php?title=Hugin_Compiling_Ubuntudiff=12721oldid=12720
Dale
From: goo...@levy.ch
To: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Ubuntu 10.10, Hugin
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010
hi KJF,
On October 16, 2010 02:55:31 pm kfj wrote:
I can't get rid of the feeling that something has changed in
wxWidgets.
can't confirm.
don't have anything on Kubuntu 10.10 to look at the panoramas now -
all the viewers I tried won't compile either. I might have to run
FSPViewer in a
On October 16, 2010 09:39:13 am kfj wrote:
I had to use
KPackageKit to install a few packets, since I did not manage to do it
all by just apt-get.
what exactly went wrong for you with apt-get? and how was KPackageKit better?
When I tried to build hugin, I got precisely the same error as
Hi!
I'm stuck in the same place
63%] Building CXX object
src/hugin1/base_wx/CMakeFiles/huginbasewx.dir/ImageCache.cpp.o
...
saw Dale's post
On 14 Okt., 18:00, Dale Beams drbe...@hotmail.com wrote:
Located it. Needed dependency wx-i18n. Updated wiki.
... so I tried to apt-get the
system.
Dale
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 06:42:48 -0700
Subject: [hugin-ptx] Re: Ubuntu 10.10, Hugin
From: _...@yahoo.com
To: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
Hi!
I'm stuck in the same place
63%] Building CXX object
src/hugin1/base_wx/CMakeFiles/huginbasewx.dir/ImageCache.cpp.o
...
saw
Specifically you need libwxbase2.8-dev and wx-i18n
Dale
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 06:42:48 -0700
Subject: [hugin-ptx] Re: Ubuntu 10.10, Hugin
From: _...@yahoo.com
To: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
Hi!
I'm stuck in the same place
63%] Building CXX object
src/hugin1/base_wx/CMakeFiles
On 15 Okt., 15:50, Dale Beams drbe...@hotmail.com wrote:
Specifically you need libwxbase2.8-dev and wx-i18n
I have libwxbase2.8-dev installed and also wx2.8-i18n
The wiki is wrong insofar as there is no 'wx-i18n' to be got by apt-
get since it is a virtual packet which is made available by
those
dependencies which have shown deficient in aptitude.
Dale
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 08:17:13 -0700
Subject: [hugin-ptx] Re: Ubuntu 10.10, Hugin
From: _...@yahoo.com
To: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
On 15 Okt., 15:50, Dale Beams drbe...@hotmail.com wrote:
Specifically you need
btw, thanks for the directories list. I hadn't gotten all the way through it
yet before I had to part to do something else.
Dale
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 08:17:13 -0700
Subject: [hugin-ptx] Re: Ubuntu 10.10, Hugin
From: _...@yahoo.com
To: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
On 15 Okt., 15:50
)
before the statement
INCLUDE(CPack)
There should be a better way of course. I really don't understand why this
directories are not created with
packages built on this system.
Kornel
Dale
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 08:17:13 -0700
Subject: [hugin-ptx] Re: Ubuntu 10.10, Hugin
On 15 Okt., 18:39, Dale Beams drbe...@hotmail.com wrote:
Have you tried building using aptitude. Ubuntu's prefered way is first the
software manager and then if needed aptitude. Therefore I always use sudo
aptitude install some_package as it's a more complete solution and will pick
Am Freitag 15 Oktober 2010 schrieb Dale Beams:
btw, thanks for the directories list. I hadn't gotten all the way through
it yet before I had to part to do something else.
Dale
Googling i found following:
...
INSTALL(FILES my_project.glade DESTINATION
to others who were trying to build.
I was able to get a successful build, following through the wiki.
Dale
From: kornel.be...@berlin.de
To: hugin-ptx@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Ubuntu 10.10, Hugin
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 20:04:36 +0200
Am Freitag 15 Oktober 2010 schrieb
Am Freitag 15 Oktober 2010 schrieb Dale Beams:
Kornel,
I use a VirtualBox vm with a fresh install of Ubuntu 10.10 for both build
and installation. My build and installations are clean. Then I'll
normally install on my own system and post the binaries.
I posted early before doing
Kornel,
On a clean system, after the *.deb is built, when attemtping to install
using the command
sudo dpkg -i some_package_name.deb
the package fails to install because it's unable to create the necessary
directories. I've assumed this is a permissions problem. I assume the
binary package
Am Freitag 15 Oktober 2010 schrieb Dale Beams:
Kornel,
On a clean system, after the *.deb is built, when attemtping to install
using the command
sudo dpkg -i some_package_name.deb
the package fails to install because it's unable to create the necessary
directories. I've assumed this
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 23:42 +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
sudo dpkg -D -i some_package_name.deb
drbe...@ubuntu:~/src/enblend/enblend.build$ sudo dpkg -D -i
enblend-4.1.1-Linux.deb
D10: ensure_pathname_nonexisting `/var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci'
Selecting previously deselected package enblend.
Am Freitag 15 Oktober 2010 schrieb Dale Beams:
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 23:42 +0200, Kornel Benko wrote:
sudo dpkg -D -i some_package_name.deb
drbe...@ubuntu:~/src/enblend/enblend.build$ sudo dpkg -D -i
enblend-4.1.1-Linux.deb
D10: ensure_pathname_nonexisting
38 matches
Mail list logo
