> 1. I Load Images (easy), then set Projection to Cylindrical.
> 2. I run Align;
Hugin will not remember the selected projection when you click [ Align ],
because the simple Align automatically selects projection, based on the
field of view.
You might not notice this, because cylindrical is the
Thanks again for your help, Groogle & Erik. I'm now learning a few things
that may differentiate my outcome from yours, and that may've resulted in
some confusion:
- I'm running the Simple interface. (I've played with the Advanced
interface, but issues with PTBatcherGUI took me back to Si
With cell phone optics sometimes the upper left corner has a slightly
different zoom factor than the lower right. Might it be something like this?
Erik Keever schrieb am Di., 30. Apr. 2019, 06:42:
> Hi Jim,
>
> What do you mean not using control points? The usual process is
> (1) Load pictures
>
Hi Jim,
What do you mean not using control points? The usual process is
(1) Load pictures
(2) Detect control points
(2b) Prune bad control points
(3) Have Hugin align images
(4) Stitch
The stitching process is "just" a bunch of computational geometry that
projects input images onto the 4π steradi
On Monday, 29 April 2019 at 19:04:23 -0700, James Proctor wrote:
> On Monday, April 29, 2019 at 6:26:49 PM UTC-7, Groogle wrote:
>>
>> On Monday, 29 April 2019 at 18:19:23 -0700, James Proctor wrote:
>>> If you have ideas re. my bigger problem of creating a true 360° pano
>>> from the original four
Um, I did!...see my reply from earlier today (PanoImages.zip).
Sure appreciate,
Jim P.
On Monday, April 29, 2019 at 6:26:49 PM UTC-7, Groogle wrote:
>
> On Monday, 29 April 2019 at 18:19:23 -0700, James Proctor wrote:
> > If you have ideas re. my bigger problem of creating a true 360° pano
> >
On Monday, 29 April 2019 at 18:19:23 -0700, James Proctor wrote:
> If you have ideas re. my bigger problem of creating a true 360° pano
> from the original fourteen images, I'd appreciate! See earlier posts
> in thread for clarification.
As I suggested, put the images somewhere where somebody can
Thanks for these suggestions; I think I now get how to optimize exposure by
overlaying two panos set for different exposures.
If you have ideas re. my bigger problem of creating a true 360° pano from
the original fourteen images, I'd appreciate! See earlier posts in thread
for clarification.
J
The horizon looks very good, the trees are straight and the hills naturally
curved.
I see that the sky colors don't look natural.
This has been caused by the automatic exposure and white balance
correction.
When you use "Align" button, the exposures and WB are adjusted, but they
rather adjust
