On Sunday, 22 January 2023 at 10:38:34 -0800, T. Modes wrote:
> bruno...gmail.com schrieb am Sonntag, 22. Januar 2023 um 12:25:21 UTC+1:
>> This 'calculate optimal size' function uses the 70% default.
>
> The calculate optimal size button is using by default no additional scaling
> factor. (So it
On Sun, 22 Jan 2023, 18:38 T. Modes, wrote:
>
> The calculate optimal size button is using by default no additional
> scaling factor. (So it ignores this setting. Except you hold the control
> button.)
> The downscale factor of 70 % is on the assistant tab in the preferences.
> This indicates
bruno...gmail.com schrieb am Sonntag, 22. Januar 2023 um 12:25:21 UTC+1:
This 'calculate optimal size' function uses the 70% default.
The calculate optimal size button is using by default no additional scaling
factor. (So it ignores this setting. Except you hold the control button.)
The
On Sun, 22 Jan 2023, 14:16 Fotis K wrote:
> thank you Bruno, interesting information! i’m reading that the green
> channel has more resolution - i wonder how this translates in my case: for
> my workflow i’m batch developing the raw files of my camera into 16bit
> tiffs that i then use as input
thank you Bruno, interesting information! i’m reading that the green
channel has more resolution - i wonder how this translates in my case: for
my workflow i’m batch developing the raw files of my camera into 16bit
tiffs that i then use as input for hugin. to be honest the few times i did
On Sun, 22 Jan 2023, 10:30 Fotis K, wrote:
> After all these years of using hugin I discovered that I never set the
> option *downscale final pano* from 70% to 100% in the preferenecs.
>
> However I always click *calculate optimal size *right before the final
> stitching.
>
This 'calculate
After all these years of using hugin I discovered that I never set the
option *downscale final pano* from 70% to 100% in the preferenecs.
However I always click *calculate optimal size *right before the final
stitching. Does this mean that I am squeezing as much detail as possible
from my
