[hugin-ptx] Re: possible memory leak in enblend enfuse? (was: hugin-mac-2009.4.0-Beta1 for download)

2009-10-08 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
2009/10/7 Harry van der Wolf hvdw...@gmail.com: I did another run from the Gui (took a few minutes to find how to compile that one). That gave more results: I didn't know that there is a GUI for it. [assemble.h:308]: (possible style) Pre-Incrementing variable 'i' is preferred to

[hugin-ptx] Re: possible memory leak in enblend enfuse? (was: hugin-mac-2009.4.0-Beta1 for download)

2009-10-08 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
2009/10/7 Stefan Peter s_pe...@swissonline.ch: Hi Lukáš instead of changing the RAM on your PC, you could use a virtual machine like vmware or virtualbox. There, you can limit the resources at your will. Regards Stefan Peter Hi Stefan, I know about this option but I thing changing

[hugin-ptx] Re: replacing make?

2009-10-08 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
Hi Gerry, 2009/10/7 Gerry Patterson thedeepvo...@gmail.com: On Oct 7, 2009, at 8:04 AM, Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I've got a quite sound idea. Just to put a bug in your head (czech saying) – to make you think about it. There are numerous bug reports which

[hugin-ptx] Re: replacing make?

2009-10-08 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
Hi Bruno, 2009/10/7 Bruno Postle br...@postle.net: On Wed 07-Oct-2009 at 15:04 +0200, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: What I think may be quite nice way to store necessary data is the XML. Although I'm not a huge XML fan (in fact I think it's overused) it could bring some improvements to the current

[hugin-ptx] Re: replacing make?

2009-10-08 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
Hi Yuv, 2009/10/7 Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch: Hi Lukáš, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: What I think may be quite nice way to store necessary data is the XML. this has been discussed before. The result was that some people favor the Makefile, others would favor the XML (me included). I didn't

[hugin-ptx] Re: replacing make?

2009-10-08 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
Hi Garry, 2009/10/8 Gerry Patterson thedeepvo...@gmail.com: On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote: On Wed 07-Oct-2009 at 17:26 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote: Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: What I think may be quite nice way to store necessary data is the XML. this has

[hugin-ptx] Re: windows binary release

2009-10-08 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Thursday 08 October 2009 schrieb Yuval Levy: Bruno Postle wrote: On Wed 07-Oct-2009 at 17:26 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote: Perl is required for Bruno's Panotools-Scripts which are part of the panotools distribution. I don't know the exact detail of the CMake build, but I think it should

[hugin-ptx] Re: Language Translation Patch, second attempt

2009-10-08 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Wednesday 07 October 2009 schrieb Yuval Levy: Hi all attached is my second attempt at patching the source tree so that also strings outside of wxWidgets can be translated. This one should work on Windows (or at least not break anything) within the SDK. Please test on OSX too. If

[hugin-ptx] Re: possible memory leak in enblend enfuse? (was: hugin-mac-2009.4.0-Beta1 for download)

2009-10-08 Thread Harry van der Wolf
2009/10/8 Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov...@gmail.com 2009/10/7 Harry van der Wolf hvdw...@gmail.com: I did another run from the Gui (took a few minutes to find how to compile that one). That gave more results: I didn't know that there is a GUI for it. cd into the gui directory and run

[hugin-ptx] Re: possible memory leak in enblend enfuse? (was: hugin-mac-2009.4.0-Beta1 for download)

2009-10-08 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
2009/10/8 Harry van der Wolf hvdw...@gmail.com: 2009/10/8 Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov...@gmail.com 2009/10/7 Harry van der Wolf hvdw...@gmail.com: I did another run from the Gui (took a few minutes to find how to compile that one). That gave more results: I didn't know that there is a

[hugin-ptx] Re: possible memory leak in enblend enfuse? (was: hugin-mac-2009.4.0-Beta1 for download)

2009-10-08 Thread Harry van der Wolf
I downloaded the git from danmar_cppcheck 2009/10/8 Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov...@gmail.com 2009/10/8 Harry van der Wolf hvdw...@gmail.com: 2009/10/8 Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov...@gmail.com 2009/10/7 Harry van der Wolf hvdw...@gmail.com: I did another run from the Gui (took a few

[hugin-ptx] Re: possible memory leak in enblend enfuse? (was: hugin-mac-2009.4.0-Beta1 for download)

2009-10-08 Thread Lukáš Jirkovský
I've tried to reproduce the bug but without success. I've remapped images. Enblend usually takes about 2-3 GB of memory with this pano. I lowered RAM to 256MB and swap from 512MB to 195MB. (KDE takes about 200MB itself). I've run enblend with: -m 200 -b 8196 to expose the bug even earlier. After

[hugin-ptx] Re: possible memory leak in enblend enfuse? (was: hugin-mac-2009.4.0-Beta1 for download)

2009-10-08 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Thursday 08 October 2009 schrieb Lukáš Jirkovský: I've tried to reproduce the bug but without success. I've remapped images. Enblend usually takes about 2-3 GB of memory with this pano. I lowered RAM to 256MB and swap from 512MB to 195MB. (KDE takes about 200MB itself). I've run enblend

[hugin-ptx] Re: GSoC2009_layout with XYZ for Windows - please test

2009-10-08 Thread Oskar Sander
Pablo, when you said that you are working on this, did you refer to the optimization strategy above, or the image-load-bug? What is new in the layout-model so that the EXIF/image parameter has broken? My understanding that stack I'd is the only new parameter(althogh meaning of others ha

[hugin-ptx] Re: GSoC2009_layout with XYZ for Windows - please test

2009-10-08 Thread Bruno Postle
On Thu 08-Oct-2009 at 16:15 +0200, Oskar Sander wrote: What is new in the layout-model so that the EXIF/image parameter has broken? My understanding that stack I'd is the only new parameter(althogh meaning of others ha chnged) The gsoc2009_layout branch was forked from the trunk shortly before

[hugin-ptx] Re: Oups, I've added two strings!

2009-10-08 Thread Bart van Andel
On 7 okt, 23:26, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote: Bart van Andel wrote: It is like letting people tilt beyond nadir/zenith when navigating a 360x180 - fine for the expert who knows what he is doing, but not helpful for the occasional user. I don't understand this point. My guess is

[hugin-ptx] Re: replacing make?

2009-10-08 Thread Harry van der Wolf
2009/10/8 Lukáš Jirkovský l.jirkov...@gmail.com I am a fan of python but it is probably overkill for the sequence of commands that would need to be executed. I think so. Please don't introduce an extra external dependency. Python works well on Linux and fine on MacOSX as long as you

[hugin-ptx] Re: Oups, I've added two strings!

2009-10-08 Thread J. Schneider
Fair enough, though I'd like to remove the crop stuff from the Stitcher tab at some point, I can't imagine that anyone uses it there. Sometimes I have to - because it is impossible to reset a crop border to 0. Once you cropped and play around with field of view and different projections

[hugin-ptx] Re: possible memory leak in enblend enfuse? (was: hugin-mac-2009.4.0-Beta1 for download)

2009-10-08 Thread Stefan Peter
Hi List, Sorry if the following is all known by the old hands. Please feel free to correct me at your leisure, otherwise I may die dumb ;) I have downloaded the project in question, and here are some results. I used Hugin 2009.2.0.4461 on linux X86_64 with 4GB Memory and 8 GB swap for the

[hugin-ptx] Re: Oups, I've added two strings!

2009-10-08 Thread J. Schneider
Yuval Levy schrieb: J. Schneider wrote: Can't start system's web browser top boundary must be smaller than bottom left boundary must be smaller than right as new untranslated strings. The first one is no problem, but can you explain where the other two are used? it's when setting the

usability (was Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Oups, I've added two strings!)

2009-10-08 Thread Yuval Levy
Bart van Andel wrote: usability is not universal: different users like different approaches. ever visited a usability lab? usability is hard facts and has nothing to do with likes or dislikes. user interaction is analyzed and dissected in detail. and the resulting rules, while depending on

[hugin-ptx] Re: Language Translation Patch, second attempt

2009-10-08 Thread Yuval Levy
Rogier Wolff wrote: On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 05:26:48PM -0400, Yuval Levy wrote: +// gettext for internalization of strings +#include libintl.h +#define _t(String) gettext(String) Is this the norm in internationalization of programs. Instead of having all those libs, translation files

[hugin-ptx] Re: Language Translation Patch, second attempt

2009-10-08 Thread Yuval Levy
Kornel Benko wrote: Why not use FindGettext.cmake? because to my understanding FindGettext.cmake finds the tools, not the library, and this is why FindGettextLibs.cmake does - at least on Linux and BSD. For Windows both did not work, so I hard-coded the results in the main CMakeLists.txt.

[hugin-ptx] Re: replacing make?

2009-10-08 Thread Yuval Levy
Hi Lukáš Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: I don't want to replace .pto files. would you mind elaborating a little bit more about what exactly you want to do? given the previous discussions on this list (that you could not know about) I (and maybe some others too) have some preconceived notions in the

[hugin-ptx] Re: GSoC2009_layout with XYZ for Windows - please test

2009-10-08 Thread Yuval Levy
either I must be confusing my experience on Linux with that on Windows, or I opened a pre-existing project file. Sorry for the confusion. Yuv allard wrote: Nope. Same crash. That's how I started. On Oct 7, 2:26 pm, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch wrote: Oskar Sander wrote: annoying, one

[hugin-ptx] Re: windows binary release

2009-10-08 Thread Yuval Levy
I thought the European Patent Office would not grant patents on software? Yuv allard wrote: Thanks. That certainly shows the USPTO database search is no good. Also surprised that this goes unmentioned in so many places. But the EPO was a pretty obvious place to look as well.

[hugin-ptx] Improved Numeric Transform in trunk

2009-10-08 Thread Yuval Levy
Hi all, I just committed an improved Numeric Transform (as was discussed a few weeks ago) to trunk. Please try it out. I am not sure yet if it will be backported to 2009.4.0 or if it will wait for the next release cycle. Currently it is just a fix of the current dialog, i.e. it behaves

[hugin-ptx] Re: replacing make?

2009-10-08 Thread Yuval Levy
Harry van der Wolf wrote: And for windows? Better or worse? nightmare. Yuv --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups hugin and other free panoramic software group. A list of frequently asked questions is

[hugin-ptx] unsubscribe failure

2009-10-08 Thread ET
hate to bother you but when I send mail to unsubscribe from this group (I now have Ubuntu Studio 9.04) I get a mail delivery failure. Could you manually remove me from this list? Thanks ET --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are

[hugin-ptx] Re: unsubscribe failure

2009-10-08 Thread Bruno Postle
On Thu 08-Oct-2009 at 15:58 -0400, ET wrote: hate to bother you but when I send mail to unsubscribe from this group (I now have Ubuntu Studio 9.04) I get a mail delivery failure. Could you manually remove me from this list? The unsubscribe address is hugin-ptx+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com The

[hugin-ptx] Re: Improved Numeric Transform in trunk

2009-10-08 Thread Bruno Postle
On Thu 08-Oct-2009 at 15:52 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote: I just committed an improved Numeric Transform (as was discussed a few weeks ago) to trunk. Sounds good, I still think this dialog is where the text entry boxes for crop and field of view should be eventually. Beyond that, I am thinking

Re: usability (was Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Oups, I've added two strings!)

2009-10-08 Thread Bart van Andel
Then tell me where you read that selecting a rectangle should *always* be done starting from the top left and dragging down right. You're putting it as if the way you're telling it's supposed to work is the only way it should ever work, but all programs I'm using or have been using (including but

[hugin-ptx] Re: Improved Numeric Transform in trunk

2009-10-08 Thread Yuval Levy
Bruno Postle wrote: On Thu 08-Oct-2009 at 15:52 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote: I just committed an improved Numeric Transform (as was discussed a few weeks ago) to trunk. Sounds good, I still think this dialog is where the text entry boxes for crop and field of view should be eventually. That

Re: usability (was Re: [hugin-ptx] Re: Oups, I've added two strings!)

2009-10-08 Thread Bruno Postle
On Thu 08-Oct-2009 at 14:00 -0700, Bart van Andel wrote: Why learn that to create a selection you *must* from the top left instead of allowing the other options too? What would you consider easier or more user friendly? I know what I'd prefer. Having played with it, the original bug is fixed -

[hugin-ptx] traditional preview

2009-10-08 Thread Yuval Levy
Hi all I recall there was some reason to keep the old preview next to the new one. Is this still the case, or can we forego the old preview and work with the new one only? The background of my question: I want to continue to move functionality into the new preview (e.g. the crop and

[hugin-ptx] Re: traditional preview

2009-10-08 Thread Bruno Postle
On Thu 08-Oct-2009 at 17:46 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote: I recall there was some reason to keep the old preview next to the new one. Is this still the case, or can we forego the old preview and work with the new one only? The 'old' Preview is somewhat more accurate, it doesn't have the problems

[hugin-ptx] Re: replacing make?

2009-10-08 Thread Bruno Postle
On Thu 08-Oct-2009 at 10:04 +0200, Lukáš Jirkovský wrote: I know I'm not great at this stuff, but in the panostart tool there is a perl module that abstacts all the business of writing and escaping Makefile rules, i.e. you declare your intent with a list of input files, a list of output

[hugin-ptx] Re: traditional preview

2009-10-08 Thread Seb Perez-D
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 23:54, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote: On Thu 08-Oct-2009 at 17:46 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote: I recall there was some reason to keep the old preview next to the new one. Is this still the case, or can we forego the old preview and work with the new one only? The

[hugin-ptx] Re: Language Translation Patch, second attempt

2009-10-08 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Thursday 08 October 2009 schrieb Yuval Levy: Kornel Benko wrote: Why not use FindGettext.cmake? because to my understanding FindGettext.cmake finds the tools, not the library, and this is why FindGettextLibs.cmake does - at least on Linux and BSD. For Windows both did not work,

[hugin-ptx] Re: traditional preview

2009-10-08 Thread Kornel Benko
Am Thursday 08 October 2009 schrieb Yuval Levy: Hi all I recall there was some reason to keep the old preview next to the new one. Is this still the case, or can we forego the old preview and work with the new one only? The background of my question: I want to continue to move