Bruno Postle wrote:
The 'old' Preview is somewhat more accurate, it doesn't have the
problems the Fast Preview sometimes has with images getting
scrambled, but the main thing is that it is currently the only way
to show HDR stacks with tonemapping - It isn't clear that this
could be
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 03:52:16PM -0400, Yuval Levy wrote:
I thought the European Patent Office would not grant patents on
software?
Because they get paid for the work they do, the patent office likes
more patents. So they were a strong proponent of the practise.
I believe there was a short
Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Thursday 08 October 2009 schrieb Yuval Levy:
Kornel Benko wrote:
Why not use FindGettext.cmake?
because to my understanding FindGettext.cmake finds the tools, not the
library, and this is why FindGettextLibs.cmake does - at least on Linux
and BSD.
I must have
On Fri 09-Oct-2009 at 06:48 +0200, Seb Perez-D wrote:
The 'old' Preview is somewhat more accurate, it doesn't have the
problems the Fast Preview sometimes has with images getting
scrambled, but the main thing is that it is currently the only way
to show HDR stacks with tonemapping - It isn't
On Fri 09-Oct-2009 at 02:49 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote:
does this mean that it is unlikely that the accuracy of the Fast Preview
will be improved?
I think it is very dependent on the graphics hardware.
and what was the result of the merger discussion?
..to do it later, after the Layout mode was
Hi all,
I've come over this problem recently. I was using Hugin (with
autopanosift and enblend) about 2 years ago and for simple panoramas
(1 row of photos with fixed exposure) it worked perfectly. I installed
new Hugin recently (Version 0.7.0 (SVN 3465)) and when using the
stitching wizard, the
On 9 Oct, 09:22, don don...@gmail.com wrote:
Hugin makes something with them and
that results in A) very weird brightness/contrast and B) in visible
seams between the photos. The settings of the stitcher tab are
here:http://don.vn.cz/temp/repo/hugin/panosettings.gif
here is the result from
On 9 okt, 10:22, don don...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
any tips? thank you.
Tip: you're still using a fairly old version. Version 0.8.0 has come
out not so long ago, and we are over 1000 svn commits further than
your current version. Newer versions might solve your issue, so please
try this first.
Thanks for the advice. I tried fiddling with the settings in EXPOSURES
tab, but that didn't give me any good result. The source photos are
JPEGs, straight from camera, both shot at 1/160 f11 @ ISO 100. To me
it seems like Hugin is doing some kind of exposure optimisation which
is not really
Hi Stefan,
2009/10/8 Stefan Peter s_pe...@swissonline.ch:
Hi List,
Sorry if the following is all known by the old hands. Please feel free
to correct me at your leisure, otherwise I may die dumb ;)
I have downloaded the project in question, and here are some results.
I used Hugin
On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 09:13 +0100, Bruno Postle wrote:
On Fri 09-Oct-2009 at 02:49 -0400, Yuval Levy wrote:
does this mean that it is unlikely that the accuracy of the Fast Preview
will be improved?
I think it is very dependent on the graphics hardware.
There are a few constants that
how about (STEP 1) merging them visually with one single dropdown,
Output, having three choices: FAST, LDR, HDR. The first one would be in
FP, the other two would be in TP. The non applicable buttons in the
toolbar would be grayed out?
Some points to consider:
Number 1: Currently fast
2009/10/9 don don...@gmail.com:
Thanks for the advice. I tried fiddling with the settings in EXPOSURES
tab, but that didn't give me any good result. The source photos are
JPEGs, straight from camera, both shot at 1/160 f11 @ ISO 100. To me
it seems like Hugin is doing some kind of exposure
(I prefer to stay on-list except when not appropriate, so here's your
answer and my new reply)
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 3:37 PM, don don...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm on Windows XP SP3. Not sure which version I can download, the
latest ones seem to be for Windows Vista only, so i tried hugin-
So what I was getting at is that could it be that most of the problems of
the layout branch like: windows-image-read-crash, EXIF-bug,
cropfactor-FOV-bug, are actually code-baseline issues for that track that
would be mostly overcome after a merge into a more mature code-track.
While the really
Sorry for cross-posting...
This is an article (in German language) about the presentation of
gigapixel imagery in Linz, Austria
http://futurezone.orf.at/stories/1628944/
Oh, I just see that it's an article by Thomas Bredenfeld :-)
Carl
ps.
I bet the Ars Electronica Center (AEC) would be a
2009/10/9 Carl von Einem ei...@gmx.de
Sorry for cross-posting...
This is an article (in German language) about the presentation of
gigapixel imagery in Linz, Austria
http://futurezone.orf.at/stories/1628944/
Oh, I just see that it's an article by Thomas Bredenfeld :-)
Carl
ps.
I bet
Has anyone succeeded at building PowerPC architecture External Tools
under Snow Leopard? I've tried, and only succeeded for Intel
architecure for ,= 10.5. I did install the 10.4u SDK, and that did
not help. It's not a biggie, but I'm curious.
Thanks,
--skip
Hi
I took a copy of the trunk just after the deghosting was merged in
(svn 4554). This built without errors on the Windows SDK (Thanks to
everybody involved). I have been playing with the deghosting since it
is a feature I've been keenly waiting for.
I'm finding that the default options only
Stefan,
Thanks for your analysis of this.
You asked about memory and responsiveness.
My Mac has 5.5Gb of RAM ... when I have a large stitch to do I
sometime restart the machine and re-open the Hugin project with only
the Stitch tab open and no preview or anything else taking up
memory ... that
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 17:33:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: grow george...@gmail.com
Stefan,
Thanks for your analysis of this.
You asked about memory and responsiveness.
My Mac has 5.5Gb of RAM ... when I have a large stitch to do I
sometime restart the machine and re-open the Hugin
On 9 Oct, 14:24, don don...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the advice. I tried fiddling with the settings in EXPOSURES
tab, but that didn't give me any good result. The source photos are
JPEGs, straight from camera, both shot at 1/160 f11 @ ISO 100. To me
it seems like Hugin is doing some kind
22 matches
Mail list logo
