I saw that in some hugin generated opt, some value which should not set to
0 i set to zero using =0, what does this means?
for example, in a hgun generated file, I can see that in first i line, v is
set to 100, which is the field of view of my camera, but in the second
line, it is set to
This is an image that uses the same settings for v as image 0 has.
Totally ok since you made sure to not zoom between shots for the same
panorama, right?
So if you also have a handheld shot for the nadir and told hugin that
this image uses a New Lens (or just un-sync it in Camera and Lens
Thanks,
Does this means that if I want to set for example a parameter of image 6 to
be similar to image 3, I should use a=3 or should I use a=0? Assuming that
I am using HDR and image 3 and 6 are taken from the same scene with
different exposure parameter? (and assuming that image 1 and 2
a b c parameters are usually linked, so they all are =0 (use value of
image 0)
Exposure parameters often need to be fine tuned (Optimization in
Exposure tab) so I guess these will not always be linked. Due to a
little flue my concentration is not spot on right now... so why not have
a look
Thanks,
My question is that =0 means linked to image 0, does =2 means linked to
image 2?
On Friday, January 25, 2013 12:36:55 PM UTC, mans...@gmail.com wrote:
I saw that in some hugin generated opt, some value which should not set to
0 i set to zero using =0, what does this means?
for
On Jan 25, 2013 1:26 PM, mans.0...@gmail.com wrote:
My question is that =0 means linked to image 0, does =2 means linked
to image 2?
Yes it does mean this.
--
Bruno
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software
yes.
A variable followed by a value - assigns that value, and may be floating point
number
A variable followed by = value - value is an image number, and use the same
value as the image.
On 2013-01-25 9:26 AM, mans.0...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks,
My question is that =0 means linked to
It could be perfect indeed, but I have no idea how to do that with Hugin.
It might as well fix the first problem which appear I suspect when I try to
straight the stripes.
I have the Gps tracks but I don't know how to use them in Hugin
Thanks for your comment
--
--
You received this message
Use a grayscale image for the mask. The used RGB images are not
correctly loaded as masks (in the 32 bit version).
You could also check the option --hard-mask to determine with variant
goes into the final image.
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Is there something like this ?
Yes.
Variant 1: first assign stack numbers to the stacked images. Then use
cpfind with the multirow switch (cpfind --multirow). This will
drastically reduce the number of image pairs checked.
Variant 2: assign rough positions to all images (set yaw, pitch and
On 25 January 2013 09:16, T. Modes thomas.mo...@gmx.de wrote:
Is there something like this ?
Yes.
Variant 1: first assign stack numbers to the stacked images. Then use
cpfind with the multirow switch (cpfind --multirow). This will
drastically reduce the number of image pairs checked.
Ken -
Am Montag, 21. Januar 2013 22:10:44 UTC+1 schrieb KenC:
Another Enblend/Enfuse developer here.
My first recommendation is to consult the Enfuse user-manual,
especially the chapter on Weighting Functions. It is pretty extensive
and hopefully comprehensive, too.
Next, please have a
Oh so that first (cyan tinted) image is a gap between two individual
images? I thought it was on a larger scale gap on a multi image mosaic. I
was thinking it might be from an errant mask, Hugin bug, or some other
esoteric problem.
What scale is this thing at? How large an area does each image
Oh so that first (cyan tinted) image is a gap between two individual
images? I thought it was on a larger scale gap on a multi image mosaic. I
was thinking it might be from an errant mask, Hugin bug, or some other
esoteric problem.
I stitch together about 150 pictures per stripes using Hugin
How are the full transparency and temperature images related. [Sorry if
this is obvious from the nona script, but I don's speak nona :-) ]
It appears the full transparency shows a conventional image mosaic with
the temperature image (presumably your temperature mosaic image?) as a
15 matches
Mail list logo
