Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success.
Snapshot: hwloc 1.0a1r1932
Start time: Tue Apr 6 21:01:05 EDT 2010
End time: Tue Apr 6 21:03:04 EDT 2010
Your friendly daemon,
Cyrador
Jeff Squyres, le Tue 06 Apr 2010 18:05:03 -0400, a écrit :
> > So I still don't see why going back to ./configure instead of using m4.
>
> Mainly because:
>
> 1. The potential for maintenance difficulties in the future.
> 2. I don't (offhand) know of anyone outside of Open MPI who would use the
On Apr 6, 2010, at 5:36 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
[...deleted most of the above where I *think* we're violently agreeing...]
> So I still don't see why going back to ./configure instead of using m4.
Mainly because:
1. The potential for maintenance difficulties in the future.
2. I don't (offh
Jeff Squyres, le Tue 06 Apr 2010 09:05:24 -0400, a écrit :
> On Apr 4, 2010, at 12:15 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Why
> > is it so? Can't the main ./configure call the hwloc m4 stuff or not
> > depending on whether the internal or the external version is used?
>
> No -- we wouldn't want to cal
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 17:36, wrote:
> Author: bgoglin
> Date: 2010-04-06 11:36:17 EDT (Tue, 06 Apr 2010)
> New Revision: 1940
> URL: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/hwloc/changeset/1940
>
> Log:
> Stop using HWLOC_NBMAXCPUS in Linux hwloc_linux_set/get_tid_cpubind
> Text files modified:
> branch
On Apr 6, 2010, at 10:54 AM, Brice Goglin wrote:
> > Is everything else set, ABI-wise?
>
> Just a very minor question: should cpuset_first/last/next/weight return
> unsigned instead of int ? They may return -1 in some corner cases, and
> even more often in the dynamic-cpuset branch. It would be (
Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Apr 3, 2010, at 6:32 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
>
>
>> By the way, instead of delaying the release while we discuss this and
>> wait for your fix, we could mark hwloc_topology_insert_misc*() as
>> experimental or even undocument it for now, release 1.0-rc1, and bring
>> it
On Apr 4, 2010, at 12:15 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > To be clear, if OMPI is to use the internal/embedded copy, it would just
> > call the $path_to_hwloc/configure.
>
> Do you mean that if OMPI had to be able to use an external copy in some
> cases, for the internal case it would now just use
On Apr 3, 2010, at 6:32 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
> By the way, instead of delaying the release while we discuss this and
> wait for your fix, we could mark hwloc_topology_insert_misc*() as
> experimental or even undocument it for now, release 1.0-rc1, and bring
> it back later if/when it's ready.
