Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success.
Snapshot: hwloc 1.1a1r2050
Start time: Tue May 4 21:01:04 EDT 2010
End time: Tue May 4 21:02:59 EDT 2010
Your friendly daemon,
Cyrador
I'm told by my local Microsoft rep that Windows does not currently expose the
total number of pages per numa node.
Do we document that these numbers on Windows are *available* memory?
On May 3, 2010, at 5:25 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Brice Goglin, le Tue 04 May 2010 00:15:42 +0200, a écrit
bgog...@osl.iu.edu, le Tue 04 May 2010 01:32:00 -0400, a écrit :
> @@ -326,6 +330,10 @@
> if (nr_tids == max_tids) {
>max_tids += 8;
>tids = realloc(tids, max_tids*sizeof(pid_t));
> + if (!tids) {
> +errno = ENOMEM;
> +return -1;
> + }
> }
>
Brice Goglin, le Tue 04 May 2010 07:54:47 +0200, a écrit :
> line 41 of src/misc.c in hwloc_snprintf():
>
> str = malloc(size);
>
>
> I am not sure what to do about this one... Is there any value we could return
> without possibly breaking the caller ?
0 seems relatively safe to
On 04/05/2010 03:57, Christopher Samuel wrote:
>
> On 03/05/10 09:57, Jeff Squyres wrote:
>
> > 1.0rc4 is up.
>
> Running coccicheck on 1.0rc4 flags up this construct, I presume
> as an ambiguous construction:
>
> if (!topology->flags & HWLOC_TOPOLOGY_FLAG_WHOLE_SYSTEM) {
>
> That's at line
