[hwloc-devel] Create success (hwloc r1.1a1r2188)

2010-06-03 Thread MPI Team
Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success. Snapshot: hwloc 1.1a1r2188 Start time: Thu Jun 3 21:01:05 EDT 2010 End time: Thu Jun 3 21:03:01 EDT 2010 Your friendly daemon, Cyrador

Re: [hwloc-devel] libhwloc.so version number

2010-06-03 Thread Samuel Thibault
Jeff Squyres, le Thu 03 Jun 2010 15:02:35 -0400, a écrit : > I think that hwloc's Libtool version number should go from 0:0:0 to 0:1:0. > > Can someone sanity check to ensure that's right? I believe that's right. Samuel

Re: [hwloc-devel] libhwloc.so version number

2010-06-03 Thread Wheeler, Kyle Bruce
On Jun 3, 2010, at 1:02 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote: > Per the Libtool rules cited here (scroll down to the "Shared Library Version > Number" section): > >http://www.open-mpi.org/software/ompi/versions/ > > I think that hwloc's Libtool version number should go from 0:0:0 to 0:1:0. > > Can some

[hwloc-devel] libhwloc.so version number

2010-06-03 Thread Jeff Squyres
Looking at the changes from 1.0 -> 1.0.1, it doesn't look like any interfaces changed: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/hwloc/changeset?old_path=/branches/v1.0&old=2100&new_path=/branches/v1.0&new=HEAD Per the Libtool rules cited here (scroll down to the "Shared Library Version Number" sectio

Re: [hwloc-devel] solaris 9 fixes

2010-06-03 Thread Jeff Squyres
Done! 1.0.1rc2 is in the usual location. Should we give it a day or two; aim to release 1.0.1 over the weekend, or Monday? On Jun 3, 2010, at 12:38 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Jeff Squyres, le Thu 03 Jun 2010 12:32:50 -0400, a écrit : > > Were you expecting all those solaris commits to the v

Re: [hwloc-devel] solaris 9 fixes

2010-06-03 Thread Samuel Thibault
Jeff Squyres, le Thu 03 Jun 2010 12:32:50 -0400, a écrit : > Were you expecting all those solaris commits to the v1.0 tree to go into the > v1.0.1 release? Or are those intended for 1.0.2? Well, I see no reason not to put them in 1.0.1 actually :), except that we need to test another rc. I'm fin

[hwloc-devel] solaris 9 fixes

2010-06-03 Thread Jeff Squyres
Samuel -- Were you expecting all those solaris commits to the v1.0 tree to go into the v1.0.1 release? Or are those intended for 1.0.2? -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

Re: [hwloc-devel] 1.0.1rc1

2010-06-03 Thread Christopher Samuel
On 02/06/10 04:03, Jeff Squyres wrote: > So do we like 1.0.1rc1? Looks OK to me. -- Christopher Samuel - Senior Systems Administrator VLSCI - Victorian Life Sciences Computational Initiative Email: sam...@unimelb.edu.au Phone: +61 (0)3 903 55545 http://www.vlsci.unimelb.edu.au/