[hwloc-devel] Create success (hwloc r1.1a1r2234)

2010-06-21 Thread MPI Team
Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success. Snapshot: hwloc 1.1a1r2234 Start time: Mon Jun 21 21:01:05 EDT 2010 End time: Mon Jun 21 21:03:07 EDT 2010 Your friendly daemon, Cyrador

Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc is failing for Pentium D

2010-06-21 Thread Samuel Thibault
Jirka Hladky, le Mon 21 Jun 2010 23:40:14 +0200, a écrit : > processor : 0 > > > processor : 1 > physical id : 0 > siblings : 2 > core id : 1 > cpu cores : 2 This looks bogus indeed. Samuel

Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc is failing for Pentium D

2010-06-21 Thread Samuel Thibault
Jirka Hladky, le Mon 21 Jun 2010 23:40:14 +0200, a écrit : > It's dual core CPU with 2x1MB L2 cache. hwloc reports correct result only on > RHEL6.0 (public beta2) with kernel 2.6.32. > > hwloc fails to report correct results on RHEL 5.5 (kernel 2.6.18) and RHEL > 4.8 > (kernel 2.6.9). Please se

Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc will be soon available as package in Fedora

2010-06-21 Thread Samuel Thibault
Thanks for your work! Samuel

Re: [hwloc-devel] [hwloc-users] hwloc and rpath

2010-06-21 Thread Samuel Thibault
Jirka Hladky, le Mon 21 Jun 2010 22:30:36 +0200, a écrit : > I'm not sure what's wrong. It seems like libtool is not smart enough to > recognize /usr/lib64 as default library directory on 64-bit system Well, on Debian it's not needed (and might even be harmful). Samuel

Re: [hwloc-devel] [hwloc-users] hwloc and rpath

2010-06-21 Thread Samuel Thibault
James Laska, le Mon 21 Jun 2010 13:15:36 -0400, a écrit : > To note, if I understand correctly, adding '/usr/lib64' > to /etc/ld.so.conf or /etc/ld.so.conf.d/* should not be needed. I agree. > Anything in the standard Fedora library locations should be recognized > and not require an additional /

Re: [hwloc-devel] [hwloc-users] hwloc and rpath

2010-06-21 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Jirka Hladky, le Mon 21 Jun 2010 18:54:47 +0200, a écrit : > I don't have "/usr/lib64" directory listed in > /etc/ld.so.conf. However, "/usr/lib64" is considered to be the > default lib location on 64-bit system. Ok. And lib

[hwloc-devel] hwloc is failing for Pentium D

2010-06-21 Thread Jirka Hladky
Hi guys, I have been always impressed how well hwloc works. Now it seems like I have found a bug on Pentium D, but it might be bug in linux kernel as well. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Pentium_D_microprocessors I have reproduced the bug on Pentium D 820 (at Dell's PowerEdge SC430)

[hwloc-devel] hwloc will be soon available as package in Fedora

2010-06-21 Thread Jirka Hladky
Hi all, I have created a package review ticket for hwloc: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=606498 Once it will be approved, hwloc will become available as package in Fedora. Thanks for a great software! Jirka PS: I have attached spec file Summary: Portable Hardware Locality - port

Re: [hwloc-devel] [hwloc-users] hwloc and rpath

2010-06-21 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Jun 21, 2010, at 4:30 PM, Jirka Hladky wrote: > I'm not sure what's wrong. It seems like libtool is not smart enough to > recognize /usr/lib64 as default library directory on 64-bit system I have > asked on Fedora packaging mailing list for advice. I will keep you updated. Awesome; thanks.

Re: [hwloc-devel] [hwloc-users] hwloc and rpath

2010-06-21 Thread Jirka Hladky
On Monday, June 21, 2010 09:58:08 pm Jeff Squyres wrote: > On Jun 21, 2010, at 3:18 PM, Jirka Hladky wrote: > > $chrpath --list /usr/local/bin/lstopo > > /usr/local/bin/lstopo: RPATH=/usr/local/lib > > Ah, I understand now. And I'm seeing the same behavior: > > $ cd util > $ rm lstopo > $ make V

Re: [hwloc-devel] [hwloc-users] hwloc and rpath

2010-06-21 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Jun 21, 2010, at 3:18 PM, Jirka Hladky wrote: > $chrpath --list /usr/local/bin/lstopo > /usr/local/bin/lstopo: RPATH=/usr/local/lib Ah, I understand now. And I'm seeing the same behavior: $ cd util $ rm lstopo $ make V=1 /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -I/usr/include/cairo -I/

Re: [hwloc-devel] [hwloc-users] hwloc and rpath

2010-06-21 Thread Jirka Hladky
On Monday, June 21, 2010 09:07:35 pm Jeff Squyres wrote: > On Jun 21, 2010, at 12:54 PM, Jirka Hladky wrote: > > However, libtool does not look into /usr/lib64 by default. I have found 2 > > ways > > > how to fix it: > Are we installing to /usr/lib64 by default? Or do you have something in > your

Re: [hwloc-devel] [hwloc-users] hwloc and rpath

2010-06-21 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Jun 21, 2010, at 12:54 PM, Jirka Hladky wrote: > However, libtool does not look into /usr/lib64 by default. I have found 2 ways > how to fix it: Are we installing to /usr/lib64 by default? Or do you have something in your specfile or your system's default that is resetting libdir to /usr/lib

Re: [hwloc-devel] [hwloc-users] hwloc and rpath

2010-06-21 Thread Jirka Hladky
On Monday, June 21, 2010 04:51:09 pm Samuel Thibault wrote: > Jeff Squyres, le Mon 21 Jun 2010 10:48:13 -0400, a écrit : > > I still see -rpath being inserted in the final link step for libhwloc.so > > (SVN build using AC 2.65, AM 1.11.1, LT 2.2.6b): > > > > /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=l

Re: [hwloc-devel] [hwloc-users] hwloc and rpath

2010-06-21 Thread Samuel Thibault
Jeff Squyres, le Mon 21 Jun 2010 10:48:13 -0400, a écrit : > I still see -rpath being inserted in the final link step for libhwloc.so (SVN > build using AC 2.65, AM 1.11.1, LT 2.2.6b): > > /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -std=gnu99 > -fvisibility=hidden -I/usr/include/libxml2

Re: [hwloc-devel] [hwloc-users] hwloc and rpath

2010-06-21 Thread Jeff Squyres
Sorry; I was on a plane while most of this conversation was occurring on Friday. I see that Samuel converted to use LDADD instead of LIBS. Cool. I still see -rpath being inserted in the final link step for libhwloc.so (SVN build using AC 2.65, AM 1.11.1, LT 2.2.6b): /bin/sh ../libtool --tag