Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success.
Snapshot: hwloc 1.1a1r2270
Start time: Tue Jun 29 21:01:02 EDT 2010
End time: Tue Jun 29 21:03:02 EDT 2010
Your friendly daemon,
Cyrador
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Jun 29, 2010, at 4:38 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > Well, "almost" all: there's no socket information. Could you perhaps
> > post the output of gather-topology.sh, in case the information is
> > available in /proc or /sys and we have mi
On Jun 29, 2010, at 4:38 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Well, "almost" all: there's no socket information. Could you perhaps
> post the output of gather-topology.sh, in case the information is
> available in /proc or /sys and we have missed it?
You're right -- in my haste, I missed that.
Brad -- c
jsquy...@osl.iu.edu, le Tue 29 Jun 2010 14:32:59 -0400, a écrit :
> +Note that upgrading the Linux kernel on the same PPC64 system
> +mentioned above to 2.6.34, hwloc is able to discover all the topology
> +information.
Well, "almost" all: there's no socket information. Could you perhaps
post the
Brice Goglin, le Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:26:52 +0200, a écrit :
> * The matrix that I keep inside the topology is ordered by os_indexes
> since logical indexes may change later in the discovery (depending on
> the matrix itself, when we group according to distances)
> * I wonder if the current code wor
Le 29/06/2010 11:15, bgog...@osl.iu.edu a écrit :
> Author: bgoglin
> Date: 2010-06-29 05:15:57 EDT (Tue, 29 Jun 2010)
> New Revision: 2257
> URL: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/hwloc/changeset/2257
>
> Log:
> Add hwloc_get_distances() which returns a matrix of distances
> for the given type.
>
