[hwloc-devel] Create success (hwloc r1.1a1r2369)

2010-07-28 Thread MPI Team
Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success. Snapshot: hwloc 1.1a1r2369 Start time: Wed Jul 28 21:01:01 EDT 2010 End time: Wed Jul 28 21:03:00 EDT 2010 Your friendly daemon, Cyrador

Re: [hwloc-devel] Bug report: topology strange on SGI UltraViolet

2010-07-28 Thread Brice Goglin
Le 28/07/2010 20:59, Bernd Kallies a écrit : > So it seems to me that you basically get a distance matrix of PU objects > NUMA node objects actually. That's what Linux and Solaris report. > from the system (the machine vendor), and probably you do agglomerative > average linkage cluster analys

Re: [hwloc-devel] Bug report: topology strange on SGI UltraViolet

2010-07-28 Thread Bernd Kallies
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 20:36 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote: > Le 28/07/2010 18:53, Brice Goglin a écrit : > > Distance matrix between Group0 objects: > > 13 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 > > 22 13 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 >

Re: [hwloc-devel] Bug report: topology strange on SGI UltraViolet

2010-07-28 Thread Bernd Kallies
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 18:53 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote: > Le 28/07/2010 18:09, Bernd Kallies a écrit : > > Is attached. I also checked for cpusets. I ran lstopo and > > gather_topology from the root cpuset, which is the only cpuset and > > contains cpus 0-767 and mems 0-47, that is - the whole machi

Re: [hwloc-devel] Bug report: topology strange on SGI UltraViolet

2010-07-28 Thread Brice Goglin
Le 28/07/2010 18:53, Brice Goglin a écrit : > Distance matrix between Group0 objects: > 13 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 > 22 13 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 > 24 22 13 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56

Re: [hwloc-devel] Bug report: topology strange on SGI UltraViolet

2010-07-28 Thread Samuel Thibault
Bernd Kallies, le Wed 28 Jul 2010 18:09:28 +0200, a écrit : > > > topology is understandeable. I'm wondering about "Group4", which > > > contains the three "Group3" objects. lstopo should print "1534GB" > > > instead of "1022GB". There is only one "Group4" object, and there are no > > > other direc

Re: [hwloc-devel] Bug report: topology strange on SGI UltraViolet

2010-07-28 Thread Brice Goglin
Le 28/07/2010 18:09, Bernd Kallies a écrit : > Is attached. I also checked for cpusets. I ran lstopo and > gather_topology from the root cpuset, which is the only cpuset and > contains cpus 0-767 and mems 0-47, that is - the whole machine. > > Background info: The UltraViolet architecture is new. T

Re: [hwloc-devel] Bug report: topology strange on SGI UltraViolet

2010-07-28 Thread Brice Goglin
Le 28/07/2010 16:21, Bernd Kallies a écrit : > We just got one SGI UltraViolet rack, containing 48 NUMA nodes with one > Octocore Nehalem each, SMT switched on. Essentially the machine is a big > shared-memory machine, similar to what SGI had with their Itanium-based > Altix 4700. > > OS is SLES11

[hwloc-devel] Bug report: topology strange on SGI UltraViolet

2010-07-28 Thread Bernd Kallies
We just got one SGI UltraViolet rack, containing 48 NUMA nodes with one Octocore Nehalem each, SMT switched on. Essentially the machine is a big shared-memory machine, similar to what SGI had with their Itanium-based Altix 4700. OS is SLES11 (2.6.32.12-0.7.1.1381.1.PTF-default x86_64). I used hwlo