[hwloc-devel] Git testing of hwloc

2013-09-06 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
Brice / Samuel -- We seem to be in pretty good shape: - github commits work as expected - we're getting emails sent upon pushes to github - DongInn got the "refs #X" and "closes #X" stuff working (i.e., putting tokens in git commit messages affects Trac tickets -- see http://trac.edgewall.org/w

Re: [hwloc-devel] [mpich-core] hwloc-1.6.x tainted with GPL?

2013-09-06 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
On Sep 6, 2013, at 10:50 AM, Pavan Balaji wrote: > Aha! I was never happier to be wrong. :-) Woohoo! > > Thanks for the clarification. No problem. Go smack your partner for not doing their due diligence properly. :-) > FWIW, I said that you guys have LGPL-2.1 code, so technically it's sti

Re: [hwloc-devel] [mpich-core] hwloc-1.6.x tainted with GPL?

2013-09-06 Thread Pavan Balaji
Aha! I was never happier to be wrong. :-) Woohoo! Thanks for the clarification. FWIW, I said that you guys have LGPL-2.1 code, so technically it's still correct ;-). But I blame Fortran for this oversight. -- Pavan On Sep 6, 2013, at 9:41 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote: > On Sep 6, 2

Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc-1.6.x tainted with GPL?

2013-09-06 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
On Sep 6, 2013, at 10:30 AM, Pavan Balaji wrote: > The mpich-3.0.x series was released with hwloc-1.6.x. One our of partners > just brought it to our attention that this version of hwloc has LGPL-2.1 code > in src/libltdl. Because GPL violations are quite serious, I want to be totally clear:

[hwloc-devel] hwloc-1.6.x tainted with GPL?

2013-09-06 Thread Pavan Balaji
Folks, The mpich-3.0.x series was released with hwloc-1.6.x. One our of partners just brought it to our attention that this version of hwloc has LGPL-2.1 code in src/libltdl. We are upgrading our code to use hwloc-1.7.x, which doesn't seem to have this problem, but if 1.6.x is still supported