Is this also going to include the topology_solaris.c improvements?
--td
On 7/10/2012 3:16 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
I am preparing a v1.5rc1 release, so here's the current status in case
somebody wants to comment.
Major changes for is v1.5:
* instruction caches
* lstopo becomes lstopo +
DONTJE <terry.don...@oracle.com> a écrit :
I finally got access to the big machine again. The code you sent
me seems to work nicely. Are you going to put it back to the
hwloc trunk and 1.4 branches?
--td
On 6/25/2012 11:31 AM, TERRY DONTJE wrote:
I'll test out the patc
I'll test out the patch once the test machine is available again.
--td
On 6/25/2012 3:42 AM, Brice Goglin wrote:
Hello Terry,
Here's a patch that should help. It cleans the code and makes all arrays
dynamic. I artificially set the initial array sizes to 4 to experience
the code on our 24-way
I guess I was looking at the wrong version of code since I now see that
topology-linux.c has fixed this issue. I guess I will need to look to
port this change over to solaris-topology.c
--td
On 6/21/2012 9:46 AM, TERRY DONTJE wrote:
I see a couple places where HWLOC_NBMAXCPUS is defined
I see a couple places where HWLOC_NBMAXCPUS is defined with a comment of
"FIXME: drop". This static size just bit me on a machine that has 1440
CPUs. I can bump up the define in my clone but I was wondering if this
fixed size might change in the near future?
--
Terry D. Dontje | Principal
Ok, I tried the patch and it seems to work for me.
On 1/18/2012 2:10 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
TERRY DONTJE, le Wed 18 Jan 2012 19:23:03 +0100, a écrit :
Don't you need the function to make lstopo work?
lstopo itself does not need it, only internal functions of libhwloc
needs it. Could you
On 1/18/2012 1:17 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
TERRY DONTJE, le Wed 18 Jan 2012 18:52:50 +0100, a écrit :
Also, I tried to build v1.4 and the trunk and I keep getting linkage errors
on lstopo-lstopo-draw.o complaining about hwloc_insert_object_by_cpuset
being undefined.
It is defined in ./src
On 1/18/2012 12:59 PM, TERRY DONTJE wrote:
On 1/18/2012 12:51 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Samuel Thibault, le Wed 18 Jan 2012 15:55:18 +0100, a écrit :
I'm getting an issue with the topology-solaris-chiptype.c work on
Solaris 10: in the ProcessorType case, the returned value does not look
On 1/18/2012 12:51 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Samuel Thibault, le Wed 18 Jan 2012 15:55:18 +0100, a écrit :
I'm getting an issue with the topology-solaris-chiptype.c work on
Solaris 10: in the ProcessorType case, the returned value does not look
like a readable string, I'm getting "¨", which
On 9/14/2011 5:54 AM, Brice Goglin wrote:
Le 13/09/2011 22:06, TERRY DONTJE a écrit :
On 9/13/2011 9:54 AM, Brice Goglin wrote:
Le 13/09/2011 21:51, TERRY DONTJE a écrit :
Both type and model are character strings. An example of what I
currently store in the sysinfo structures are:
type
On 9/14/2011 5:54 AM, Brice Goglin wrote:
Le 13/09/2011 22:06, TERRY DONTJE a écrit :
On 9/13/2011 9:54 AM, Brice Goglin wrote:
Le 13/09/2011 21:51, TERRY DONTJE a écrit :
Both type and model are character strings. An example of what I
currently store in the sysinfo structures are:
type
On 9/13/2011 9:23 AM, Brice Goglin wrote:
Le 12/09/2011 21:01, Brice Goglin a écrit :
Le 09/09/2011 13:25, TERRY DONTJE a écrit :
On 9/8/2011 3:10 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
Hello Terry,
Indeed there's nothing like this as of today. We talked about it in
the past but it's not very easy
s. Since one can look for the named object and it is
either going to be there or not :-).
Anyway, I'll play around with this for Solaris. Can I then email you
the diff for a review?
thanks,
--td
Le 08/09/2011 20:57, TERRY DONTJE a écrit :
I wanted to verify that I am not overlooking some
On 04/06/2011 08:49 AM, Brice Goglin wrote:
Le 31/03/2011 18:06, Jeff Squyres a écrit :
On Mar 28, 2011, at 5:26 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
libpci is needed to make this work. And only Linux gives you OS devices
for now (we use sysfs to translate between pci devs and os devs).
Is libpci
Samuel Thibault wrote:
Hello,
Terry Dontje, le Fri 06 Aug 2010 13:11:30 -0400, a écrit :
Is anyone looking at replacing the Solaris processor_bind calls with
lgrp_affinity_set calls in hwloc?
I eventually added using lgrp_affinity_set(). Not as a replacement for
processor_bind
Is anyone looking at replacing the Solaris processor_bind calls with
lgrp_affinity_set calls in hwloc?
--
Oracle
Terry D. Dontje | Principal Software Engineer
Developer Tools Engineering | +1.650.633.7054
Oracle * - Performance Technologies*
95 Network Drive, Burlington, MA 01803
Email
16 matches
Mail list logo
