On 04/06/2011 08:49 AM, Brice Goglin wrote:
Le 31/03/2011 18:06, Jeff Squyres a écrit :
On Mar 28, 2011, at 5:26 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
libpci is needed to make this work. And only Linux gives you OS devices
for now (we use sysfs to translate between pci devs and os devs).
Is libpci
Le 31/03/2011 18:06, Jeff Squyres a écrit :
> On Mar 28, 2011, at 5:26 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
>
>> libpci is needed to make this work. And only Linux gives you OS devices
>> for now (we use sysfs to translate between pci devs and os devs).
>>
> Is libpci available on all platforms? Or is
Le 31/03/2011 18:06, Jeff Squyres a écrit :
>
> Good. Although I think we should plan to make this the default in some
> future version (i.e., say that in the docs).
>
I agree with Samuel on this. Keep things people for basic users. Without
I/O devices, the topology is usually very simple,
On Mar 31, 2011, at 2:41 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> [re: making PCI the default]
> I'm unsure about it. We need to keep the simple things simple, and many
> people will only care about CPU placement first, so that should remain
> simple.
Ok. I guess I don't have too strong of an opinion here.
On Mar 28, 2011, at 5:26 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
> First, to avoid breaking existing applications, I/O devices are not
> added to the topology unless a new topology flag is set. Only lstopo
> enables PCI devices by default.
Good. Although I think we should plan to make this the default in some
Le 14/03/2011 05:19, Samuel Thibault a écrit :
> I was wondering about merging the I/O branch:
> - people have not expressed what they want so much,
> - but people will probably not until it's exposed more,
> - it's really a useful thing, and works fine in our tests,
> - I'd like to see it out :)
