On Tuesday, June 22, 2010 01:50:26 am Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Jirka Hladky, le Mon 21 Jun 2010 23:40:14 +0200, a écrit :
> > processor : 0
> >
> >
> > processor : 1
> > physical id : 0
> > siblings: 2
> > core id : 1
> > cpu cores : 2
>
> This looks bogus indeed.
>
> Samu
Jirka Hladky, le Mon 21 Jun 2010 23:40:14 +0200, a écrit :
> processor : 0
>
>
> processor : 1
> physical id : 0
> siblings : 2
> core id : 1
> cpu cores : 2
This looks bogus indeed.
Samuel
Jirka Hladky, le Mon 21 Jun 2010 23:40:14 +0200, a écrit :
> It's dual core CPU with 2x1MB L2 cache. hwloc reports correct result only on
> RHEL6.0 (public beta2) with kernel 2.6.32.
>
> hwloc fails to report correct results on RHEL 5.5 (kernel 2.6.18) and RHEL
> 4.8
> (kernel 2.6.9). Please se
Hi guys,
I have been always impressed how well hwloc works. Now it seems like I have
found a bug on Pentium D, but it might be bug in linux kernel as well.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Pentium_D_microprocessors
I have reproduced the bug on
Pentium D 820 (at Dell's PowerEdge SC430)
