Samuel Thibault, le Thu 03 Oct 2013 18:01:25 +0200, a écrit :
> I have automatically imported the previous debian uploads. I don't
> think we really need to keep the detailed commit, the releases have
> brought small diffs enough.
And that permits to switch to another layout which is nicer to
Jeff Squyres (jsquyres), le Thu 03 Oct 2013 12:38:05 +0200, a écrit :
> On Oct 2, 2013, at 12:47 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
> > I can do it (assuming the "hwloc-svn-conversion" git tree it uptodate).
> > But I need somebody to create the ompi/hwloc-debian repo on github and
>
On Oct 3, 2013, at 6:41 AM, Brice Goglin wrote:
> It was likely moved to the attic. If svn2git doesn't find it, that's
> fine, I still have it in my archives in case we ever want it (very
> unlikely).
Ah, ok.
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal
Le 03/10/2013 12:37, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) a écrit :
>> The only important one is "cuda".
>> Most other branches were merged, or manually applied to trunk, or are
>> obsolete. Maybe just keep "json" and "valarray" in case we ever need to
>> revive them.
> I just sent a mail to Dave; let's see
On Oct 2, 2013, at 12:47 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
> I can do it (assuming the "hwloc-svn-conversion" git tree it uptodate).
> But I need somebody to create the ompi/hwloc-debian repo on github and
> give us credentials.
Done.
> The only important one is "cuda".
> Most
Le 02/10/2013 17:54, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) a écrit :
> On Sep 28, 2013, at 10:05 AM, Brice Goglin wrote:
>
>> The only things that we're still missing as far as I know are:
>> * the debian repository as explained above (by the way, beware that
>> branches are not under
On Sep 28, 2013, at 10:05 AM, Brice Goglin wrote:
> The only things that we're still missing as far as I know are:
> * the debian repository as explained above (by the way, beware that
> branches are not under branches/ in there)
Sorry for the delay in replying -- I suck
Le 27/09/2013 23:11, Brice Goglin a écrit :
> A couple things:
> * Did you rebuild the secondary git repo of the debian/ "submodule"? We
> said we would store it on the side of the main hwloc repo. It can go
> under github too, but no need to integrate it with trac or so.
I've updated the wiki
Le 27/09/2013 22:44, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) a écrit :
> Ok, the infrastructure is now updated. I've generated the first snapshot
> tarballs in http://www.open-mpi.org/software/hwloc/nightly/. Nightly
> snapshots for <=v1.6 have all been removed.
>
> Git is fully open for business. Enjoy.
>
Ok, the infrastructure is now updated. I've generated the first snapshot
tarballs in http://www.open-mpi.org/software/hwloc/nightly/. Nightly snapshots
for <=v1.6 have all been removed.
Git is fully open for business. Enjoy.
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal
10 matches
Mail list logo