Re: [hwloc-devel] nightly snapshot tarballs now available

2013-10-03 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, le Thu 03 Oct 2013 18:01:25 +0200, a écrit : > I have automatically imported the previous debian uploads. I don't > think we really need to keep the detailed commit, the releases have > brought small diffs enough. And that permits to switch to another layout which is nicer to

Re: [hwloc-devel] nightly snapshot tarballs now available

2013-10-03 Thread Samuel Thibault
Jeff Squyres (jsquyres), le Thu 03 Oct 2013 12:38:05 +0200, a écrit : > On Oct 2, 2013, at 12:47 PM, Brice Goglin wrote: > > I can do it (assuming the "hwloc-svn-conversion" git tree it uptodate). > > But I need somebody to create the ompi/hwloc-debian repo on github and >

Re: [hwloc-devel] nightly snapshot tarballs now available

2013-10-03 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
On Oct 3, 2013, at 6:41 AM, Brice Goglin wrote: > It was likely moved to the attic. If svn2git doesn't find it, that's > fine, I still have it in my archives in case we ever want it (very > unlikely). Ah, ok. -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal

Re: [hwloc-devel] nightly snapshot tarballs now available

2013-10-03 Thread Brice Goglin
Le 03/10/2013 12:37, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) a écrit : >> The only important one is "cuda". >> Most other branches were merged, or manually applied to trunk, or are >> obsolete. Maybe just keep "json" and "valarray" in case we ever need to >> revive them. > I just sent a mail to Dave; let's see

Re: [hwloc-devel] nightly snapshot tarballs now available

2013-10-03 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
On Oct 2, 2013, at 12:47 PM, Brice Goglin wrote: > I can do it (assuming the "hwloc-svn-conversion" git tree it uptodate). > But I need somebody to create the ompi/hwloc-debian repo on github and > give us credentials. Done. > The only important one is "cuda". > Most

Re: [hwloc-devel] nightly snapshot tarballs now available

2013-10-02 Thread Brice Goglin
Le 02/10/2013 17:54, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) a écrit : > On Sep 28, 2013, at 10:05 AM, Brice Goglin wrote: > >> The only things that we're still missing as far as I know are: >> * the debian repository as explained above (by the way, beware that >> branches are not under

Re: [hwloc-devel] nightly snapshot tarballs now available

2013-10-02 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
On Sep 28, 2013, at 10:05 AM, Brice Goglin wrote: > The only things that we're still missing as far as I know are: > * the debian repository as explained above (by the way, beware that > branches are not under branches/ in there) Sorry for the delay in replying -- I suck

Re: [hwloc-devel] nightly snapshot tarballs now available

2013-09-28 Thread Brice Goglin
Le 27/09/2013 23:11, Brice Goglin a écrit : > A couple things: > * Did you rebuild the secondary git repo of the debian/ "submodule"? We > said we would store it on the side of the main hwloc repo. It can go > under github too, but no need to integrate it with trac or so. I've updated the wiki

Re: [hwloc-devel] nightly snapshot tarballs now available

2013-09-27 Thread Brice Goglin
Le 27/09/2013 22:44, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) a écrit : > Ok, the infrastructure is now updated. I've generated the first snapshot > tarballs in http://www.open-mpi.org/software/hwloc/nightly/. Nightly > snapshots for <=v1.6 have all been removed. > > Git is fully open for business. Enjoy. >

[hwloc-devel] nightly snapshot tarballs now available

2013-09-27 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
Ok, the infrastructure is now updated. I've generated the first snapshot tarballs in http://www.open-mpi.org/software/hwloc/nightly/. Nightly snapshots for <=v1.6 have all been removed. Git is fully open for business. Enjoy. -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal