I agree -- all of the things you mention are do-able.
But it's a whole lot more bookkeeping and care/feeding to ensure that nothing
goes wrong vs. just calling a hwloc core function and assuming it's there.
Such things will require maintenance over time.
In the end -- it's a tradeoff:
- do
On Sep 5, 2012, at 11:08 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>> No. It's not really an ltdl issue. ltdl is just a portable wrapper around
>> OS-specific dlopen-like mechanisms.
>
> I understand that, but dlopen is usually used for plugins, and plugins
> usually need such kind of calling back into
Jeff Squyres, le Wed 05 Sep 2012 17:06:00 +0200, a écrit :
> On Sep 5, 2012, at 10:21 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > So ltdl does not help for that matter?
>
> No. It's not really an ltdl issue. ltdl is just a portable wrapper around
> OS-specific dlopen-like mechanisms.
I understand
