Brice Goglin, le Mon 22 Mar 2010 11:43:10 +0100, a écrit :
> Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Bert Wesarg, le Sun 21 Mar 2010 13:31:14 +0100, a écrit :
> >> I would like to propose an interface change for these function, so
> >> that the caller provide the to-be-filled cpuset, to reduce the
> >> alloc/fr
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:21, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Bert Wesarg, le Sun 21 Mar 2010 13:31:14 +0100, a écrit :
>> I would like to propose an interface change for these function, so
>> that the caller provide the to-be-filled cpuset, to reduce the
>> alloc/free frequency.
>
> This is indeed bett
Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Bert Wesarg, le Sun 21 Mar 2010 13:31:14 +0100, a écrit :
>
>> I would like to propose an interface change for these function, so
>> that the caller provide the to-be-filled cpuset, to reduce the
>> alloc/free frequency.
>>
>
> This is indeed better (and actually re
Bert Wesarg, le Sun 21 Mar 2010 13:31:14 +0100, a écrit :
> I would like to propose an interface change for these function, so
> that the caller provide the to-be-filled cpuset, to reduce the
> alloc/free frequency.
This is indeed better (and actually reduces the amount of code in
hwloc), I have i
