Jeff Squyres wrote:
> FWIW, having a "simple" API like that might be a Good Thing...?
>
> I.e., just be able to bind to a specific thread/core/socket with a
> minimum fuss/muss. Even if such an API would be mainly syntactic sugar
> for other hwloc functionality -- there definitely is something to b
Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success.
Snapshot: hwloc 1.0a1r1371
Start time: Mon Nov 23 21:01:02 EST 2009
End time: Mon Nov 23 21:02:51 EST 2009
Your friendly daemon,
Cyrador
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 02:54:35PM -0600, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> No, we *definitely* do not want the .so version to match the hwloc
> version. See the guidance on .so version numbers in the GNU Libtool
> docs.
Right.
> Note that hwloc's .so version number is controlled by the top-level
> VERSION
