Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success.
Snapshot: hwloc 1.0a1r1450
Start time: Tue Dec 8 21:01:05 EST 2009
End time: Tue Dec 8 21:03:02 EST 2009
Your friendly daemon,
Cyrador
Brice Goglin wrote:
> Jeff Squyres wrote:
>
>> On Dec 8, 2009, at 1:17 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
>>
>>
>>
New require LT 2.2.6b
>>> By the way, isn't LT_INIT supposed to enforce the required version? We
>>> had a bug report from somebody running libtool 1.5 (
Jeff Squyres wrote:
> What happens if you run configure?
>
In the first error I sent, configure works and build fails with:
Making all in src
make[1]: Entering directory `/net/home/bgoglin/hwloc/build3/src'
CC topology.lo
../libtool: line 819: X--tag=CC: command not found
../libtool: line
What happens if you run configure?
On Dec 8, 2009, at 1:41 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Brice Goglin wrote:
> > Jeff Squyres wrote:
> >
> >> On Dec 8, 2009, at 1:23 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> We already have
> >>> LT_PREREQ([2.2.6])
> >>> LT_INIT
> >>> It doesn't seem to ac
Brice Goglin wrote:
> Jeff Squyres wrote:
>
>> On Dec 8, 2009, at 1:23 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> We already have
>>> LT_PREREQ([2.2.6])
>>> LT_INIT
>>> It doesn't seem to actually enforce libtool >= 2.2.6
>>>
>>>
>> Really? That would be surprising -- I don't have
Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Dec 8, 2009, at 1:23 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
>
>
>> We already have
>> LT_PREREQ([2.2.6])
>> LT_INIT
>> It doesn't seem to actually enforce libtool >= 2.2.6
>>
>
> Really? That would be surprising -- I don't have LT < 2.2.6 convenient to
> test with...
>
Here
On Dec 8, 2009, at 1:23 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
> We already have
> LT_PREREQ([2.2.6])
> LT_INIT
> It doesn't seem to actually enforce libtool >= 2.2.6
Really? That would be surprising -- I don't have LT < 2.2.6 convenient to test
with...
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
Jeff Squyres wrote:
> On Dec 8, 2009, at 1:17 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
>
>
>>> New require LT 2.2.6b
>>>
>> By the way, isn't LT_INIT supposed to enforce the required version? We
>> had a bug report from somebody running libtool 1.5 (in the libpci
>> branch). He got obscur errors during au
On Dec 8, 2009, at 1:17 PM, Brice Goglin wrote:
>> New require LT 2.2.6b
>
> By the way, isn't LT_INIT supposed to enforce the required version? We
> had a bug report from somebody running libtool 1.5 (in the libpci
> branch). He got obscur errors during autogen.sh, but nothing said
> clearly tha
I updated the v0.9 branch to require LT 2.2.6b to build tarballs, and the trunk
to require AC 2.65 (the latest) and LT 2.2.6b.
Libltdl (shipped in libtool) had a security issue that was patched in 2.2.6b.
The issue doesn't affect hwloc (hwloc doesn't even use libltdl -- yet), but I
didn't want
jsquy...@osl.iu.edu wrote:
> Author: jsquyres
> Date: 2009-12-08 13:15:03 EST (Tue, 08 Dec 2009)
> New Revision: 1447
> URL: https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/hwloc/changeset/1447
>
> Log:
> New require LT 2.2.6b
>
By the way, isn't LT_INIT supposed to enforce the required version? We
had a bug rep
Hello,
Ashley Pittman, le Fri 04 Dec 2009 12:08:11 +, a écrit :
> On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 13:04 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Ashley Pittman, le Fri 04 Dec 2009 11:06:12 +, a écrit :
> > > The debian version of -.txt (lstopo 0.9.3rc1) leaves my terminal with
> > > the colours inverted af
12 matches
Mail list logo
