On Tuesday, November 16, 2010 10:31:11 pm Brice Goglin wrote:
> Le 16/11/2010 15:18, Samuel Thibault a écrit :
> > Jirka Hladky, le Tue 16 Nov 2010 21:37:01 +0100, a écrit :
> >> There was some discussion about hwloc-distrib --among
> >>
> >> If I understand it correctly, --among accepts one of
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there,
At the hwloc talk on the Cisco booth by Brice he mentioned
work to locate PCI bridges & devices and their socket
locality and put up a nice graphic which was very interesting.
So last night I grabbed the latest snapshot of trunk but
couldn'
Hi Samuel,
thanks for looking into it! I'm using hwloc_distribute to distribute parallel
jobs on multi-socket systems.
Usually, it gives nice results: running
hwloc-distrib --single
on box with sockets will ditrbitute one job per socket. This is what I
want.
hwloc-distrib --single <2*N>
wil
Hello Chris,
It's not in trunk yet. Try this branch instead:
https://svn.open-mpi.org/svn/hwloc/branches/libpci
We are not sure yet how we should expose all these devices. Right now,
we have a new BRIDGE type, a PCI_DEVICE type, and a OS_DEVICE type
(which corresponds to OS names such as eth0 o
Hi all,
Red Hat would like to included hwloc in the upcoming version of the Red Hat
Enterprise Linux 6.1. There is Bugzilla 648593
[RFE] Include Portable Hardware Locality (hwloc) in RHEL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648593
to address this.
I got following input from the devel:
Le 18/11/2010 08:50, Jirka Hladky a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> Red Hat would like to included hwloc in the upcoming version of the Red Hat
> Enterprise Linux 6.1. There is Bugzilla 648593
> [RFE] Include Portable Hardware Locality (hwloc) in RHEL
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=648593
>
On Thursday, November 18, 2010 03:55:35 pm Brice Goglin wrote:
> Le 18/11/2010 08:50, Jirka Hladky a écrit :
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Red Hat would like to included hwloc in the upcoming version of the Red
> > Hat Enterprise Linux 6.1. There is Bugzilla 648593
> > [RFE] Include Portable Hardware Locali
Jirka Hladky, le Thu 18 Nov 2010 16:03:21 +0100, a écrit :
> On Thursday, November 18, 2010 03:55:35 pm Brice Goglin wrote:
> > > Could you please add the legend to the picture explaining which index was
> > > used?
> >
> > I guess it's possible.
> Oh, this would be great! Will it make it into 1.1
Jirka Hladky, le Thu 18 Nov 2010 15:14:07 +0100, a écrit :
> thanks for looking into it! I'm using hwloc_distribute to distribute parallel
> jobs on multi-socket systems.
>
> Usually, it gives nice results: running
> hwloc-distrib --single
> on box with sockets will ditrbitute one job per sock
On Thursday, November 18, 2010 05:40:03 pm Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Jirka Hladky, le Thu 18 Nov 2010 15:14:07 +0100, a écrit :
> > thanks for looking into it! I'm using hwloc_distribute to distribute
> > parallel jobs on multi-socket systems.
> >
> > Usually, it gives nice results: running
> > hwl
Jirka Hladky, le Thu 18 Nov 2010 18:17:59 +0100, a écrit :
> To summarize:
> --among can be used to specify the highest level of hierarchy where to start
> the distribution, right?
Yes. I've renamed it into --from, and extended the manpage documentation
on it.
> Possible inputs are:
> machine (d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19/11/10 01:42, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Hello Chris,
Hello! Good to talk to you today. :-)
> It's not in trunk yet. Try this branch instead:
> https://svn.open-mpi.org/svn/hwloc/branches/libpci
Wonderful, thank you! I've attached what it shows
Hello,
Christopher Samuel, le Thu 18 Nov 2010 23:47:20 +0100, a écrit :
> Does the information occur to the right of the socket with
> the closest distance to the devices ?
If your case, hwloc was apparently unable to decide whether the devices
where "inside" one or the other NUMA node. Could you
Le 18/11/2010 16:58, Samuel Thibault a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> Christopher Samuel, le Thu 18 Nov 2010 23:47:20 +0100, a écrit :
>
>> Does the information occur to the right of the socket with
>> the closest distance to the devices ?
>>
> If your case, hwloc was apparently unable to decide whet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 19/11/10 10:04, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Many dual-nehalem-EP boxes have a single I/O hub which is connected to
> both sockets, so no I/O affinity there. If your machine wasn't designed
> to have many big PCIe slots (e.g. to plug multiple GPUs), that'
15 matches
Mail list logo
