Re: [hwloc-devel] Fwd: [hwloc-svn] svn:hwloc r5588 - trunk/config

2013-05-07 Thread Brice Goglin
I can't be 100% sure but the fix looks sane to me, and it didn't break any regression testing build. Brice Le 07/05/2013 03:22, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) a écrit : > Brice / Samuel -- > > Can you confirm that this is the correct fix? I need someone to review it so > that I can CMR it into OMPI

Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc-1.7 issue roundup

2013-05-07 Thread Brice Goglin
Pavan, I just pushed another round of commits to trunk, which hopefully address everything said earlier (except the LDTL problem waiting for Jeff's review). 1) autogen args https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/hwloc/changeset/5586 2) sys/sysctl.h #ifdef fix https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/hwloc/changeset/

Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc-1.7 issue roundup

2013-05-07 Thread Pavan Balaji
Thanks Brice. What's the timeframe for 1.7.1? I want to see if we can move to that for our mpich-3.1 release. -- Pavan On 05/07/2013 09:53 AM US Central Time, Brice Goglin wrote: > Pavan, > > I just pushed another round of commits to trunk, which hopefully address > everything said earlier (

Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc-1.7 issue roundup

2013-05-07 Thread Brice Goglin
We got several important bug reports (and fixes) in the last days. I think we don't need anything new aside from the pending LTDL fix. So let's say within 2 weeks. Brice Le 07/05/2013 16:59, Pavan Balaji a écrit : > Thanks Brice. What's the timeframe for 1.7.1? I want to see if we can > move t

Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc-1.7 issue roundup

2013-05-07 Thread Pavan Balaji
Perfect. Thanks. -- Pavan On 05/07/2013 10:07 AM US Central Time, Brice Goglin wrote: > We got several important bug reports (and fixes) in the last days. I > think we don't need anything new aside from the pending LTDL fix. So > let's say within 2 weeks. > > Brice > > > Le 07/05/2013 16:59

Re: [hwloc-devel] RPATH issues when building in Fedora 18

2013-05-07 Thread Jiri Hladky
Thanks a lot for all the feedback !!! I went with autoreconf --force --install which solved a problem. @Jeff: the versions of your quadtuple looks good to me! I'm using the same with the exception of automake (1.12.2 which is even older than yours). I have now successfully created rpm for hwloc

Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc embedding vs libltdl

2013-05-07 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
Sorry for the high latency reply. I thought about this quite a bit today. Here's a thinking-out-of-the-box question: should we just use the default/system installed libltdl instead of embedding? If we don't embed, many of these problems go away, right? I.e., we can still have the same option

Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc embedding vs libltdl

2013-05-07 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
Er... here's the patch I forgot to attach. :-) On May 7, 2013, at 6:00 PM, "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" wrote: > Sorry for the high latency reply. > > I thought about this quite a bit today. Here's a thinking-out-of-the-box > question: should we just use the default/system installed libltdl i

Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc embedding vs libltdl

2013-05-07 Thread Brice Goglin
Le 08/05/2013 00:00, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) a écrit : > Sorry for the high latency reply. > > I thought about this quite a bit today. Here's a thinking-out-of-the-box > question: should we just use the default/system installed libltdl instead of > embedding? I don't have anything against this.

Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc embedding vs libltdl

2013-05-07 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
On May 7, 2013, at 6:25 PM, Brice Goglin wrote: >> - ensure to have libtool avoid setting up Fortran and C++ (a trick we >> learned from MPICH :-) ) > > Is this related to ltdl anyhow? No. Just picked it up since it's related to libtool. :-) It could well be a separate commit (and doesn't

Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc embedding vs libltdl

2013-05-07 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
On May 7, 2013, at 6:25 PM, Brice Goglin wrote: > I don't have anything against this. What was the reason for not using > the default/system libltdl in OMPI? libtool was buggy when you started > using it? I neglected to answer this. Yes, plus libltdl grew new functionality that we needed (glob

Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc embedding vs libltdl

2013-05-07 Thread Samuel Thibault
Jeff Squyres (jsquyres), le Wed 08 May 2013 02:21:02 +0200, a écrit : > On May 7, 2013, at 6:25 PM, Brice Goglin wrote: > > > I don't have anything against this. What was the reason for not using > > the default/system libltdl in OMPI? libtool was buggy when you started > > using it? > > > I ne

Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc embedding vs libltdl

2013-05-07 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
How's this patch? The only question I have is: how do we figure out what libraries to put in the .pc file in the --disable-shared --enable-static case? On May 7, 2013, at 8:24 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Jeff Squyres (jsquyres), le Wed 08 May 2013 02:21:02 +0200, a écrit : >> On May 7, 2013,

[hwloc-devel] Create success (hwloc r1.8a1r5606)

2013-05-07 Thread MPI Team
Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success. Snapshot: hwloc 1.8a1r5606 Start time: Tue May 7 21:01:01 EDT 2013 End time: Tue May 7 21:05:39 EDT 2013 Your friendly daemon, Cyrador

[hwloc-devel] Create success (hwloc r1.7.1rc1r5593)

2013-05-07 Thread MPI Team
Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success. Snapshot: hwloc 1.7.1rc1r5593 Start time: Tue May 7 21:05:39 EDT 2013 End time: Tue May 7 21:09:53 EDT 2013 Your friendly daemon, Cyrador

[hwloc-devel] Create success (hwloc r1.6.3rc1r5594)

2013-05-07 Thread MPI Team
Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success. Snapshot: hwloc 1.6.3rc1r5594 Start time: Tue May 7 21:09:54 EDT 2013 End time: Tue May 7 21:14:16 EDT 2013 Your friendly daemon, Cyrador

[hwloc-devel] Create success (hwloc r1.5.3rc1r5595)

2013-05-07 Thread MPI Team
Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success. Snapshot: hwloc 1.5.3rc1r5595 Start time: Tue May 7 21:14:17 EDT 2013 End time: Tue May 7 21:18:21 EDT 2013 Your friendly daemon, Cyrador