[hwloc-devel] Create success (hwloc r0.9.1a1r1028)

2009-09-29 Thread MPI Team
Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success. Snapshot: hwloc 0.9.1a1r1028 Start time: Tue Sep 29 21:01:04 EDT 2009 End time: Tue Sep 29 21:02:55 EDT 2009 Your friendly daemon, Cyrador

Re: [hwloc-devel] dynamic cpuset_t?

2009-09-29 Thread Fawzi Mohamed
On 29-set-09, at 20:51, Fawzi Mohamed wrote: On 29-set-09, at 20:43, Samuel Thibault wrote: Fawzi Mohamed, le Tue 29 Sep 2009 20:39:02 +0200, a écrit : It comes down to what you want to have, if you think you might want to go the sparse full granularity way then indeed alloc/copy/free

Re: [hwloc-devel] dynamic cpuset_t?

2009-09-29 Thread Fawzi Mohamed
On 29-set-09, at 20:43, Samuel Thibault wrote: Fawzi Mohamed, le Tue 29 Sep 2009 20:39:02 +0200, a écrit : It comes down to what you want to have, if you think you might want to go the sparse full granularity way then indeed alloc/copy/free should be added Yes, that's my point: do we

Re: [hwloc-devel] dynamic cpuset_t?

2009-09-29 Thread Samuel Thibault
Fawzi Mohamed, le Tue 29 Sep 2009 20:39:02 +0200, a écrit : > It comes down to what you want to have, if you think you might want to > go the sparse full granularity way then indeed alloc/copy/free should > be added Yes, that's my point: do we really want it? Samuel

Re: [hwloc-devel] structure assumptions, duplication

2009-09-29 Thread Fawzi Mohamed
Hi Samuel, On 29-set-09, at 18:14, Samuel Thibault wrote: Fawzi Mohamed, le Tue 29 Sep 2009 17:39:17 +0200, a écrit : so that in the future one could avoid storing it at least in the deepest levels where it is easy and relatively cheap to generate (and where one would have the largest

Re: [hwloc-devel] structure assumptions, duplication

2009-09-29 Thread Samuel Thibault
Fawzi Mohamed, le Tue 29 Sep 2009 17:39:17 +0200, a écrit : > so that in the future one could avoid storing it at least in the > deepest levels where it is easy and relatively cheap to generate (and > where one would have the largest savings). Even the deepest levels would have a L1 cache level

Re: [hwloc-devel] structure assumptions, duplication

2009-09-29 Thread Fawzi Mohamed
Thanks for the quick answers! On 29-set-09, at 16:59, Samuel Thibault wrote: Fawzi Mohamed, le Tue 29 Sep 2009 16:39:47 +0200, a écrit : Maybe I worry too much, but with machines with 1'000 of processor coming, and maybe wanting local restricted copies to know the topology of the whole

[hwloc-devel] structure assumptions, duplication

2009-09-29 Thread Fawzi Mohamed
I have began to use hwloc, and I found it quite nice to use, but I do have some comments and questions: 1) redundancy: for several operations, looping there are several ways to to the same thing. it is nice support several paradigms, but these occupy space and will be very difficult to

Re: [hwloc-devel] New features or release?

2009-09-29 Thread Brice Goglin
Jeff Squyres wrote: > I see a bunch of new features being added to the hwloc trunk. > > Is the intent to stabilize the trunk and release, or is the intent to > add a bunch of PCI features before releasing? I kinda thought we were > trying to stabilize and release ASAP...? PCI stuff is going in

[hwloc-devel] New features or release?

2009-09-29 Thread Jeff Squyres
I see a bunch of new features being added to the hwloc trunk. Is the intent to stabilize the trunk and release, or is the intent to add a bunch of PCI features before releasing? I kinda thought we were trying to stabilize and release ASAP...? -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com