Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc in Debian, anybody working on RPMs?

2009-11-20 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Nov 20, 2009, at 7:46 AM, Brice Goglin wrote: > Using the 0.9.2 tarball the version on the .so is "0.0.0". This doesn't seem > "right". I'm happy to code up the libtool fu to make the so version match the > package version but is that what we want? I don't really expect that the ABI

Re: [hwloc-devel] Crash with ignoring HWLOC_OBJ_NODE in 0.9.2

2009-11-20 Thread Samuel Thibault
Samuel Thibault, le Fri 20 Nov 2009 15:54:43 +0100, a écrit : > Introduce several numagroup types? How many? That's not easy to > answer. Or maybe we can add an "ignore" configuration function that also takes a pair of depth parameters to ignore a range of depths for a given type. Here you

Re: [hwloc-devel] Crash with ignoring HWLOC_OBJ_NODE in 0.9.2

2009-11-20 Thread Michael Raymond
NUMAGROUP sounds fine to me. Misc appears to be working for me though and I'd like to start shipping hwloc on all our boxes in the next few months. Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello, > > Michael Raymond, le Fri 20 Nov 2009 08:43:10 -0600, a écrit : >> In one pattern I might want to place

Re: [hwloc-devel] Crash with ignoring HWLOC_OBJ_NODE in 0.9.2

2009-11-20 Thread Michael Raymond
Yes. Here's output from a small one of those with only 2 pre-release blades. Brice Goglin wrote: > Michael Raymond wrote: >> Our architecture has blades with two Nehalems on them, and the blades >> are connected together in a CC-NUMA fashion. Each Nehalem shows up as a >> Node and the

Re: [hwloc-devel] Crash with ignoring HWLOC_OBJ_NODE in 0.9.2

2009-11-20 Thread Brice Goglin
Michael Raymond wrote: > Our architecture has blades with two Nehalems on them, and the blades > are connected together in a CC-NUMA fashion. Each Nehalem shows up as a > Node and the blades show up as Miscs. So you're running on the Altix UV with Nehalem-EX that SGI announced at SC? Is there

Re: [hwloc-devel] Crash with ignoring HWLOC_OBJ_NODE in 0.9.2

2009-11-20 Thread Samuel Thibault
Michael Raymond, le Fri 20 Nov 2009 08:18:53 -0600, a écrit : > It looks like I spoke too soon on the fix. That solves the problem > but it keeps the Miscs from being created and in some situations I'd > like to keep the Miscs but not the nodes. Oh? In which situation? Can't you just ignore

Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc in Debian, anybody working on RPMs?

2009-11-20 Thread Brice Goglin
Tony Breeds wrote: > I have he beginings of a Fedora package. > > Using the 0.9.2 tarball the version on the .so is "0.0.0". This doesn't seem > "right". I'm happy to code up the libtool fu to make the so version match the > package version but is that what we want? I don't really expect that