Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc-bind syntax

2009-12-04 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Dec 4, 2009, at 5:36 AM, Brice Goglin wrote: > > It might be good to safely ignore 0x if it's present, but that's a small > > feature enhancement that can be done at any time (I filed a future ticket). > > It seems to work actually :) Hmm -- I don't think so...? "0x1" can't pass this test

Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc-bind syntax

2009-12-04 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Dec 4, 2009, at 5:32 AM, Ashley Pittman wrote: > > It might be good to safely ignore 0x if it's present, but that's a small > > feature enhancement that can be done at any time (I filed a future ticket). > > Maybe not relevant but it bit me so I'll say it here, using "%x" with > sscanf on a

Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc-bind again

2009-12-04 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Dec 4, 2009, at 1:09 AM, Brice Goglin wrote: > > shell$ hwloc-bind > > > > (i.e., invoking hwloc-bind with no arguments) > > > > returns an exit status of 0. Shouldn't it return non-zero? > > Yeah maybe I'm going to interpret that as "Hell yes! Please implement. THANKS!!!" ;-) -- Jeff

Re: [hwloc-devel] Disabling X component

2009-12-04 Thread Ashley Pittman
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 13:04 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Ashley Pittman, le Fri 04 Dec 2009 11:06:12 +, a écrit : > > The debian version of -.txt (lstopo 0.9.3rc1) leaves my terminal with > > the colours inverted after I call it, I have to do a reset to get back > > to black on grey

Re: [hwloc-devel] Disabling X component

2009-12-04 Thread Samuel Thibault
Ashley Pittman, le Fri 04 Dec 2009 11:06:12 +, a écrit : > The debian version of -.txt (lstopo 0.9.3rc1) leaves my terminal with > the colours inverted after I call it, I have to do a reset to get back > to black on grey background. Uh, odd. Which terminal are you using? Samuel

Re: [hwloc-devel] Disabling X component

2009-12-04 Thread Brice Goglin
Ashley Pittman wrote: > I installed the debian package of hwloc yesterday and discovered that > the default action of lstopo is to display a window with a picture in. > I guess I don't have the right development packages installed for this > to be enabled in my local build. > > In my tool I want

[hwloc-devel] Disabling X component

2009-12-04 Thread Ashley Pittman
I installed the debian package of hwloc yesterday and discovered that the default action of lstopo is to display a window with a picture in. I guess I don't have the right development packages installed for this to be enabled in my local build. In my tool I want to ensure the text version is

Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc-bind syntax

2009-12-04 Thread Brice Goglin
Jeff Squyres wrote: > It might be good to safely ignore 0x if it's present, but that's a small > feature enhancement that can be done at any time (I filed a future ticket). > It seems to work actually :) >> We might want to drop the Linux "cpuset" word and use "cgroup" instead. >> Both are

Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc-bind syntax

2009-12-04 Thread Ashley Pittman
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 20:32 -0500, Jeff Squyres wrote: > > > Ah, ok. To be clear, is it accurate to say that it is one of the > > > following forms: > > > > > > - a hex number (without leading "0x" -- would "0x" be ignored if it is > > > supplied?) > > > > We never used 0x there. > > Ok. > >

Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc-bind again

2009-12-04 Thread Brice Goglin
Jeff Squyres wrote: > I notice that > > shell$ hwloc-bind > > (i.e., invoking hwloc-bind with no arguments) > > returns an exit status of 0. Shouldn't it return non-zero? I'd think it was > an error if you didn't give hwloc-bind anything to do. For example, we > wouldn't want a script with