Re: [hwloc-devel] sometimes unused params

2010-01-08 Thread Samuel Thibault
Jeff Squyres, le Fri 08 Jan 2010 12:22:59 -0500, a écrit : > On Jan 8, 2010, at 12:22 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > >> How do you guys want to handle params that are *sometimes* unused? > > > > I'd just mark them unused. > > Is it harmful to mark them unused when they're actually used? No.

Re: [hwloc-devel] sometimes unused params

2010-01-08 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Jan 8, 2010, at 12:22 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: >> How do you guys want to handle params that are *sometimes* unused? > > I'd just mark them unused. Is it harmful to mark them unused when they're actually used? -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com

[hwloc-devel] sometimes unused params

2010-01-08 Thread Jeff Squyres
How do you guys want to handle params that are *sometimes* unused? For example, topology.c:1450 is: - int hwloc_topology_set_fsroot(struct hwloc_topology *topology, const char *fsroot_path) { /* cleanup existing backend */ hwloc_backend_exit(topology); #ifdef HWLOC_LINUX_SYS if

Re: [hwloc-devel] "file name is too long" error during make distwith libpci branch

2010-01-08 Thread Jeff Squyres
On Jan 8, 2010, at 10:41 AM, Brice Goglin wrote: > > If we want to whack the .tex files, we certainly can (and just include the > > HTML and PDFs). I don't think I have a strong feeling either way. > > Are these tex files shipped because people might want to rebuild the PDF > ? I am ok if we

Re: [hwloc-devel] "file name is too long" error during make distwith libpci branch

2010-01-08 Thread Brice Goglin
Jeff Squyres wrote: > On Jan 6, 2010, at 3:26 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > >> Cédric Augonnet, le Wed 06 Jan 2010 21:20:48 +0100, a écrit : >> >>> tar: >>>