Re: [hwloc-devel] want 1.0rc4?

2010-05-03 Thread Jeff Squyres
Awesome; thanks Chris! On May 3, 2010, at 8:57 PM, Christopher Samuel wrote: > On 03/05/10 09:57, Jeff Squyres wrote: > > > 1.0rc4 is up. > > Running coccicheck on 1.0rc4 flags up this construct, I presume > as an ambiguous construction: > > if (!topology->flags &

Re: [hwloc-devel] want 1.0rc4?

2010-05-03 Thread Christopher Samuel
On 03/05/10 09:57, Jeff Squyres wrote: > 1.0rc4 is up. Running coccicheck on 1.0rc4 flags up this construct, I presume as an ambiguous construction: if (!topology->flags & HWLOC_TOPOLOGY_FLAG_WHOLE_SYSTEM) { That's at line 1518 of src/topology.c in hwloc_discover(). The check file simply

[hwloc-devel] Create success (hwloc r1.1a1r2040)

2010-05-03 Thread MPI Team
Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success. Snapshot: hwloc 1.1a1r2040 Start time: Mon May 3 21:01:05 EDT 2010 End time: Mon May 3 21:03:01 EDT 2010 Your friendly daemon, Cyrador

Re: [hwloc-devel] Windows 7 problems

2010-05-03 Thread Brice Goglin
If this gives access to the SRAT table or things like that, it may give us a lot of locality info (IIRC, that's what Linux reads to get NUMA and I/O locality information). But I hope I won't be the one writing the ACPI table parser :) Brice On 04/05/2010 00:09, Jeff Squyres wrote: > Is this

Re: [hwloc-devel] Windows 7 problems

2010-05-03 Thread Jeff Squyres
Is this helpful? http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms724379(VS.85).aspx You can use that to enumerate the ACPI firmware tables directly. Supposedly, you should be able to discover topology information. Not very user friendly, unfortunately. On May 3, 2010, at 4:52 PM, Jeff Squyres

Re: [hwloc-devel] Windows 7 problems

2010-05-03 Thread Jeff Squyres
He says: GlobalMemoryStatusEx http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa366589(v=VS.85).aspx But that doesn't give numa node information. :-\ He's looking to see if he can find another function that gives numa info, but it may take a little time (the windows memory subsystem guy is not

Re: [hwloc-devel] Windows 7 problems

2010-05-03 Thread Samuel Thibault
Jeff Squyres, le Mon 03 May 2010 15:57:37 -0500, a écrit : > Running lstopo on w7 (64 bit): > > - > C:\Temp\hwloc>lstopo > Note: GetLogicalProcessorInformationEx was never tested yet! > - Ooops, it seems I have forgotten to remove it. Now done. > Plus, the memory it reported was the

[hwloc-devel] Windows 7 problems

2010-05-03 Thread Jeff Squyres
Running lstopo on w7 (64 bit): - C:\Temp\hwloc>lstopo Note: GetLogicalProcessorInformationEx was never tested yet! - Plus, the memory it reported was the currently free memory, not total memory. -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to:

Re: [hwloc-devel] want 1.0rc4?

2010-05-03 Thread Jeff Squyres
Posted. On May 3, 2010, at 10:37 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Jeff Squyres, le Mon 03 May 2010 09:57:09 -0400, a écrit : > > 1.0rc4 is up. Send me a windows binary when you get a chance. > > http://dept-info.labri.fr/~thibault/tmp/hwloc-win32-build-1.0rc4.zip > > Samuel >

Re: [hwloc-devel] want 1.0rc4?

2010-05-03 Thread Samuel Thibault
Jeff Squyres, le Mon 03 May 2010 09:57:09 -0400, a écrit : > 1.0rc4 is up. Send me a windows binary when you get a chance. http://dept-info.labri.fr/~thibault/tmp/hwloc-win32-build-1.0rc4.zip Samuel

Re: [hwloc-devel] want 1.0rc4?

2010-05-03 Thread Jeff Squyres
1.0rc4 is up. Send me a windows binary when you get a chance. On May 3, 2010, at 9:30 AM, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Jeff Squyres, le Mon 03 May 2010 09:28:41 -0400, a écrit : > > I see a flurry of windows-related activity over the weekend. > > > > Do you guys want me to cut rc4? > > I'm done

Re: [hwloc-devel] want 1.0rc4?

2010-05-03 Thread Samuel Thibault
Jeff Squyres, le Mon 03 May 2010 09:28:41 -0400, a écrit : > I see a flurry of windows-related activity over the weekend. > > Do you guys want me to cut rc4? I'm done with what I wanted to fix in rc3. Samuel