[hwloc-devel] Create success (hwloc r1.1a1r2369)

2010-07-28 Thread MPI Team
Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success. Snapshot: hwloc 1.1a1r2369 Start time: Wed Jul 28 21:01:01 EDT 2010 End time: Wed Jul 28 21:03:00 EDT 2010 Your friendly daemon, Cyrador

Re: [hwloc-devel] Bug report: topology strange on SGI UltraViolet

2010-07-28 Thread Brice Goglin
Le 28/07/2010 20:59, Bernd Kallies a écrit : > So it seems to me that you basically get a distance matrix of PU objects > NUMA node objects actually. That's what Linux and Solaris report. > from the system (the machine vendor), and probably you do agglomerative > average linkage cluster

Re: [hwloc-devel] Bug report: topology strange on SGI UltraViolet

2010-07-28 Thread Bernd Kallies
On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 20:36 +0200, Brice Goglin wrote: > Le 28/07/2010 18:53, Brice Goglin a écrit : > > Distance matrix between Group0 objects: > > 13 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 > > 22 13 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 >

Re: [hwloc-devel] Bug report: topology strange on SGI UltraViolet

2010-07-28 Thread Brice Goglin
Le 28/07/2010 18:53, Brice Goglin a écrit : > Distance matrix between Group0 objects: > 13 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 > 22 13 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 > 24 22 13 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56

Re: [hwloc-devel] Bug report: topology strange on SGI UltraViolet

2010-07-28 Thread Samuel Thibault
Bernd Kallies, le Wed 28 Jul 2010 18:09:28 +0200, a écrit : > > > topology is understandeable. I'm wondering about "Group4", which > > > contains the three "Group3" objects. lstopo should print "1534GB" > > > instead of "1022GB". There is only one "Group4" object, and there are no > > > other