Re: [hwloc-devel] PCI device name question

2012-03-22 Thread Christopher Samuel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 21/03/12 08:07, Brice Goglin wrote: > New patch attached, it doesn't add port numbers for non-IB > devices. Extract from lstopo on SGI XE270 box with Mellanox dual port IB card: PCIBridge PCI 15b3:673c Net L#2 "ib1" Net

Re: [hwloc-devel] BGQ empty topology with MPI

2012-03-22 Thread Paul H. Hargrove
From the same machine that Dan is using: {hargrove@cetuslac1 ~}$ mpicc -v mpicc for MPICH2 version 1.4.1p1 [...hairy details omitted...] gcc version 4.4.6 (BGQ-dev-120305) -Paul On 3/22/2012 7:43 PM, Christopher Samuel wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 22/03/12 20:58,

Re: [hwloc-devel] BGQ empty topology with MPI

2012-03-22 Thread Christopher Samuel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 22/03/12 20:58, Brice Goglin wrote: > So there's something strange going on when MPI is added. Which MPI > are using? Is this a derivative of MPICH that embeds hwloc? (MPICH > >= 1.2.1 if I remember correctly) Not sure about BG/Q, but BG/P uses

Re: [hwloc-devel] BGQ empty topology with MPI

2012-03-22 Thread Christopher Samuel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 22/03/12 01:08, Daniel Ibanez wrote: > Attached is the stderr and stdout from lstopo compiled as you > said. Interesting, so it's not correctly detecting the topology as BG/Q is 16 compute cores, each with 4 hardware threads. Instead it's

[hwloc-devel] Create success (hwloc r1.4.2a1r4420)

2012-03-22 Thread MPI Team
Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success. Snapshot: hwloc 1.4.2a1r4420 Start time: Thu Mar 22 21:04:20 EDT 2012 End time: Thu Mar 22 21:07:07 EDT 2012 Your friendly daemon, Cyrador

[hwloc-devel] Create success (hwloc r1.5a1r4418)

2012-03-22 Thread MPI Team
Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success. Snapshot: hwloc 1.5a1r4418 Start time: Thu Mar 22 21:01:01 EDT 2012 End time: Thu Mar 22 21:04:20 EDT 2012 Your friendly daemon, Cyrador

Re: [hwloc-devel] Fwd: BGQ empty topology with MPI

2012-03-22 Thread Brice Goglin
Le 22/03/2012 23:33, Daniel Ibanez a écrit : > I've run this test before (didnt keep the results but can run it again). > I got debug output and compared it with the output from a hwloc test > executable > and I noticed that my program did not show any PU objects were discovered. > In my program

Re: [hwloc-devel] Fwd: BGQ empty topology with MPI

2012-03-22 Thread Daniel Ibanez
I've run this test before (didnt keep the results but can run it again). I got debug output and compared it with the output from a hwloc test executable and I noticed that my program did not show any PU objects were discovered. In my program the first discovered topology is just a Machine object,

Re: [hwloc-devel] Fwd: BGQ empty topology with MPI

2012-03-22 Thread Brice Goglin
Le 22/03/2012 23:07, Daniel Ibanez a écrit : > > I suspected this might be the reason, so I called "nm" > with the static versions of the libraries their compiler wrappers > link against and I could not find the term "hwloc" in the output. > Is this a valid test? If your hwloc is still compiled

Re: [hwloc-devel] BGQ empty topology with MPI

2012-03-22 Thread Samuel Thibault
Daniel Ibanez, le Thu 22 Mar 2012 23:07:01 +0100, a écrit : > I suspected this might be the reason, so I called "nm" > with the static versions of the libraries their compiler wrappers > link against and I could not find the term "hwloc" in the output. > Is this a valid test? Ah, right, embedded

Re: [hwloc-devel] BGQ empty topology with MPI

2012-03-22 Thread Samuel Thibault
Brice Goglin, le Thu 22 Mar 2012 10:58:46 +0100, a écrit : > I don't see anything bad in your outputs. > So there's something strange going on when MPI is added. Which MPI are using? > Is this a derivative of MPICH that embeds hwloc? (MPICH >= 1.2.1 if I remember > correctly) There might be

Re: [hwloc-devel] BGQ empty topology with MPI

2012-03-22 Thread Brice Goglin
I don't see anything bad in your outputs. So there's something strange going on when MPI is added. Which MPI are using? Is this a derivative of MPICH that embeds hwloc? (MPICH >= 1.2.1 if I remember correctly) Brice Le 21/03/2012 15:08, Daniel Ibanez a écrit : > Attached is the stderr and