[hwloc-devel] Fwd: [hwloc-svn] svn:hwloc r5588 - trunk/config

2013-05-06 Thread Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
Brice / Samuel -- Can you confirm that this is the correct fix? I need someone to review it so that I can CMR it into OMPI release branches. Thanks! Begin forwarded message: > From: > Subject: [hwloc-svn] svn:hwloc r5588 - trunk/config > Date: May 6, 2013

[hwloc-devel] Create success (hwloc r1.8a1r5587)

2013-05-06 Thread MPI Team
Creating nightly hwloc snapshot SVN tarball was a success. Snapshot: hwloc 1.8a1r5587 Start time: Mon May 6 21:01:01 EDT 2013 End time: Mon May 6 21:05:39 EDT 2013 Your friendly daemon, Cyrador

Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc-1.7 issue roundup

2013-05-06 Thread Pavan Balaji
On 05/06/2013 07:24 AM US Central Time, Brice Goglin wrote: > I am testing your patches on FreeBSD 9.1 under POSIX_SOURCE, things > compile fine but hwloc complains that it cannot find the number of > processors (because it needs sysctl or sysconf to do so, not available > without BSD types). So

Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc and c89/c99

2013-05-06 Thread Pavan Balaji
On 05/06/2013 01:25 AM US Central Time, Brice Goglin wrote: > I think we removed C99 use (and configure check) from the code in 1.2 > because some compilers didn't properly support it. I looked at the code once more. It seems to assume fixed width integers all over the place. These are all

Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc patch suggestions

2013-05-06 Thread Pavan Balaji
On 05/06/2013 06:07 AM US Central Time, Pavan Balaji wrote: > > On 05/06/2013 04:08 AM US Central Time, Brice Goglin wrote: >> Le 05/05/2013 19:26, Pavan Balaji a écrit : >>> -autoreconf -ivf >>> +autoreconf ${autoreconf_args:"-ivf"} >>> -- 1.8.1.2 >> >> This needs an additional dash: >> >>

Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc patch suggestions

2013-05-06 Thread Pavan Balaji
On 05/06/2013 04:08 AM US Central Time, Brice Goglin wrote: > Le 05/05/2013 19:26, Pavan Balaji a écrit : >> -autoreconf -ivf >> +autoreconf ${autoreconf_args:"-ivf"} >> -- 1.8.1.2 > > This needs an additional dash: > > -autoreconf -ivf > +autoreconf ${autoreconf_args:-"-ivf"} Where did you

Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc and c89/c99

2013-05-06 Thread Pavan Balaji
On 05/06/2013 01:25 AM US Central Time, Brice Goglin wrote: > I think we removed C99 use (and configure check) from the code in 1.2 > because some compilers didn't properly support it. Wow. That was a while ago, and I totally missed that change. We noticed some errors on FreeBSD (oh yeah, I

Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc patch suggestions

2013-05-06 Thread Brice Goglin
Le 05/05/2013 19:26, Pavan Balaji a écrit : > From d5bee8b50ccefd1ae9f7cd6d69639bfc45b3b0b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Pavan Balaji > Date: Sun, 5 May 2013 12:21:14 -0500 > Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Allow users to specify other flags to autoreconf. > > No reviewer. > --- >

Re: [hwloc-devel] hwloc and c89/c99

2013-05-06 Thread Brice Goglin
I think we removed C99 use (and configure check) from the code in 1.2 because some compilers didn't properly support it. Brice Le 06/05/2013 03:14, Pavan Balaji a écrit : > Is hwloc supposed to support c89 only (no c99)? I remember having this > discussion earlier and the hwloc developers said